• QuadraphonicQuad welcomes you and encourages your participation! Treat all members with respect. Please keep all discussions civil, even when you have a strong opinion on a particular topic.

    Do not offer for free, offer for sale, offer for trade, or request copies or files of copyrighted material - no matter how rare or unavailable to the public they might be. We do not condone the illegal sharing of music. There are many places on the internet where you can participate in such transactions, but QuadraphonicQuad is not one of them. We are here to encourage and support new multichannel releases from those companies that still provide them and as such the distribution of illegal copies of recordings is counter-productive to that effort. Any posts of this sort will be deleted without notification.

    Please try to avoid discussions that pit one format against another. Hint for new users: make liberal use of the search facilities here at QuadraphonicQuad. Our message base is an incredibly rich resource of detailed information on virtually all topics pertaining to surround-sound. You will be surprised at what you can find with a little digging!

King Crimson - Heaven & Earth box set

~dave~~wave~

500 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2016
Messages
544
Reaction score
1,062
Points
126
Location
Lincoln, NE USA
Got the code this morning.
(From the lovely Iona Singleton, who I got to say hello to in Denver, where she organized the celebration package.)

The files download from the existing DGM music for purchase site, the code pays the $129.50 price for 121 files in ten folders.

Immediately this morning a shf member noticed that rather that flac with metadata, the files are wav 48/24 with no metadata .
Except for the first track of the first file, which is flac, like everything else on DGM. :unsure:
 

François

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
250
Reaction score
377
Points
236
Location
France
So, IIRC, the problem on the blu-ray was that they used 44.1kHz CD masters, as if they were 48kHz (because blu-ray can't do 44.1), hence the speed-up. I hope they used hi-rez studio masters for the corrected files, not the 44.1kHz CD masters upsampled to 48kHz…
 

Plan9

500 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Jul 27, 2012
Messages
531
Reaction score
268
Points
306
Location
Toulouse, France
So, IIRC, the problem on the blu-ray was that they used 44.1kHz CD masters, as if they were 48kHz (because blu-ray can't do 44.1), hence the speed-up. I hope they used hi-rez studio masters for the corrected files, not the 44.1kHz CD masters upsampled to 48kHz…
The thing is, most of these original masters are 16bit/44.1kHz.
Some of them were mastered in 24bit resolution for this edition. The problem came as you wrote from the original sample rate (44.1kHz) they forgot to convert for Blu-Ray compatibility (48kHz).
 

François

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
250
Reaction score
377
Points
236
Location
France
So what’s the point of upsampled files? Every player that can play music files will play any sample rate, and it’s not like us consumers will author a blu-ray from these files. (Are there even any good consumer grade blu-ray authoring software available?)
 

Plan9

500 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Jul 27, 2012
Messages
531
Reaction score
268
Points
306
Location
Toulouse, France
So what’s the point of upsampled files? Every player that can play music files will play any sample rate, and it’s not like us consumers will author a blu-ray from these files. (Are there even any good consumer grade blu-ray authoring software available?)
My understanding is that they are offering what should have been placed on the Blu-Rays originally.
Had they offered 44.1kHz files, someone else would have complained. They made a choice.
Plus, believe or not, some people plan to author a corrected Blu-Ray (or DVDs) with these files.
 
Last edited:

kap'n krunch

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
6,032
Reaction score
3,529
Points
696
Location
la Nouvelle Orleans...
As seen on the DGM Facebook page:
"DGM recently announced that replacement downloads are now available for those albums in the “Heaven & Earth” boxed set, which, due to a mistake by the BluRay author, sadly played at the wrong speed. This has led to renewed online discussion about the merits or otherwise of replacement discs versus downloads. As promised, here is a philosophical consideration of the fundamental issues which this raises..."
(CAPS mine)
Can you believe the brass cojones on this guy?
YES DAVID, WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME SOMETHING WAS YOUR FAULT?
Some members here know that this was a mistake from MANAGEMENT who did not pass the correct info...it even went unnoticed by the battery of testers..
AND THIS is how he repays them?..oooo, instant karma gonna get him....
Funny how DGM is always "fighting" against wrongdoings by the music industry yet they act the same f*cking way....

I guess that "we made a mistake" is too much for David Singleton....
 

~dave~~wave~

500 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2016
Messages
544
Reaction score
1,062
Points
126
Location
Lincoln, NE USA
Can you believe the brass cojones on this guy?
Yeah, I can, actually.
Needs them to put up with b.s.
Anyone who thinks he can do better is free to start his own record company.

https://www.dgmlive.com/diaries/David Singleton/replacement-discs-versus-downloads

Replacement discs versus downloads
DGM recently announced that replacement downloads are now available for those albums in the “Heaven & Earth” boxed set, which, due to a mistake by the BluRay author, sadly played at the wrong speed. This has led to renewed online discussion about the merits or otherwise of replacement discs versus downloads. As promised, here is a philosophical consideration of the fundamental issues which this raises

The very quick and simple version: you can either charge the maximum retail price that the contents of your box will justify - thus earning very large profits more than sufficient to cover unexpected costs - or you can fill a boxed set to bursting with wonderful goodies, while keeping it more generally affordable, but not have such luxury.

You can approach the music business through the prism of business or the prism of music.

A boxed set, viewed through the prism of business, may well be excellent – but it would be designed around the profit motive ie. it would only contain sufficient music to justify the price tag and the work involved. To put it differently, a boxed set with eighteen CDs, four BluRays, and two DVDAs would only be made if it was going to be significantly more profitable than one with fewer contents. A quick search on Amazon would suggest that, by that judgement, “Heaven & Earth” is either under-priced by about £100. Or, more likely, the price is right, but it should contain less music.

A boxed set, viewed through the prism of music, is designed entirely differently. It is an opportunity to share with music lovers all the music that falls within the remit of that box. Thus, every year, we start with a list of the music that we believe a box might contain. Having completed that list, we inevitably find other items, and we spend as much as six months working very hard to make ourselves poorer. The selling price of the box does not increase due to the increased work or content. There is a market value above which a boxed set becomes largely the remit of wealthy collectors and would thus fail to achieve its main purpose. With each added disc, particularly BluRays or DVDs, the profitably continues to fall sharply, as the third-party authoring and manufacturing costs rise inexorably.

None of us make any complaint about this or would have it any other way. Money is, of course, important, but if it were the defining principle, all of us within DGM would long since have moved on to more lucrative pastures. The purpose of the work has to be the music. Commerce is the necessary fuel to make it happen. This may seem loft idealism. But it is also practical. I suspect that many of those who faithfully buy our products would also long since have moved on were it not for the ethos that underpins them.

To operate in the marketplace while being free of the values of the marketplace

To help bring music into the world which would otherwise be unlikely to do so.

Thus, in the case of the Heaven & Earth boxed set, we can proudly create a boxed set that contains over 7,000 minutes of music in all the various formats. A figure that bears repeating. Seven thousand minutes. That is over one hundred hours. Or more than nine days spent listening continuously for twelve hours. A triumph by all those involved.

Of all this music, frustratingly and annoyingly, ten items play at the wrong speed – hence the downloads from the site. One might think that the remaining ninety hours (far in excess, I suspect, of any of our previous boxes) together with the printed contents more than justified the purchase price.

Apparently not. Any relationship mediated by commerce is necessarily problematic. Consumers have perceived rights. In the case of concerts, this may mean that they have the right to take photographs. In the case of the boxed set, it means that they have the right to a replacement disc.

Except that replacement discs do not exist. The boxed set has never been re-manufactured, nor is it likely to be. The cost of replacement discs (authoring and manufacturing 16,000 BluRays, and then paying someone to receive requests and mail out discs to 8,000 people worldwide) would realistically be close to £100,000.

So in practice the request for replacement discs is a request that not only do we spend up to six months making these boxes, we now actually lose money in doing so, even if the fault is not our own. Hardly a sustainable business model. Indeed, some of the abusive emails that I have received inevitably make me question any future boxed sets. The innocent joy of polishing treasures in the belief that you are sharing them with those best able to appreciate them is long gone.

Contrary to what some of them believe, I bear no malice towards music fans on the audiophile forums who uncovered the error. Indeed, it is fortunate that they did (and we would always want to know of any error that someone finds). But the apparently joyful “treasure hunt” that it became, where “fans” were congratulating each other on finding some new timing error, often by ripping the music and comparing times in a computer rather than listening, did become distasteful. Before we reached the question of the sometimes vociferous and aggressive demands for replacement discs.

After the seemingly endless hours that have been devoted to this, one feels like screaming “what do you want us to do?!”. And the answer is simple – some people want their replacement disc no matter what. Or alternatively, they accept that it is, of course, completely unfeasible for everyone to have a replacement, but they want to be an exception, and have one made just for them.

Actions have repercussions. Faced with the same last-minute decision to re-author a BluRay to add bonus albums, we would now almost certainly decline. It takes valuable time and money, adds nothing to the selling price and increases the chances of errors. We have learnt the hard way that people do not thank you for adding the bonus content – they complain loudly about the mistake.

But what of even larger decisions? Whether, for example, to add an additional BluRay so that a new discovery can be added in higher resolution or in surround sound. Seen through the values of the marketplace, only a fool would do more work to make a boxed set less profitable, and, by increasing the content, again increase the likelihood of an error. And it seems those values are increasingly being forced upon us.

I am of course angry that there were errors in the Heaven & Earth boxed set. I am particularly angry on behalf of all those who worked so hard to create it that we are not celebrating and remembering an astonishing musical triumph, but endlessly discussing a third-party authoring error. And yes, I am angry on behalf of the fans that they do not have the perfect boxed set, which we all worked so hard to give them. But right now, I am even more angry that those who continue to insist on replacement discs rather than downloads may force us into a position where DGM can no longer be true to its business aims.

To operate in the marketplace while being free of the values of the marketplace

To help bring music into the world which would otherwise be unlikely to do so.

Both things are only possible with goodwill from those at DGM, but also with matching goodwill and understanding from music lovers. Just as concert goers who insist on their perceived rights can ruin a concert (and did, in fact, drive Robert Fripp to cease live performance in 2008) so if purchasers force the values of the marketplace upon us, then it will no longer be possible to bring music into the world in this way.

This question of the replacement discs is therefore surprisingly fundamental.

 

rusinurbe

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Nov 6, 2002
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
692
Points
1,566
Location
Royal Wootton Bassett, UK
I say never look a gift horse ...
They needn't have offer the remedy at all thankfully the have (And yes I have taken advantage and downloaded) I'll stick the FLAC Fines on a memory stick and find somewhere to put it in the box preferably.

I am sure its as frustrating for them this error has occurred and has been missed by the product testers, the blu ray authors, manufacturers and even DGM themselves.

DGM are a small company and have offered a solution there are some larger companies who probably would not have done anything about this. Yes its taken some time but from what I have seen everyone just about involved in this has been involved in the tour and other 50th Anniversary stuff (There has been plenty of KC releases this year)

I am happy with the outcome. (For the record I would not have noticed the problem the benefit I guess of not having perfect pitch or golden ears :) )
 

François

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
250
Reaction score
377
Points
236
Location
France
I’m still puzzled how such an error can occur. Do professional blu-ray authoring software let you use 44.1 files without giving an error, or offering to upsample them to 48kHz? Or did they used raw binary files without an header that indicates the sample rate?
 

Marplot

300 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
331
Reaction score
738
Points
103
Location
Ohio, USA
got my downloads. All of the files were wav. A quick run through sox and I have corrected 48k flac ready for tagging.
 
Top