• QuadraphonicQuad welcomes you and encourages your participation! Treat all members with respect. Please keep all discussions civil, even when you have a strong opinion on a particular topic.

    Do not request or offer for sale or trade copies or files of copyrighted material - no matter how rare or unavailable to the public they might be. We do not condone the illegal sharing of music. There are many places on the internet where you can participate in such transactions, but QuadraphonicQuad is not one of them. We are here to encourage and support new multichannel releases from those companies that still provide them and as such the distribution of illegal copies of recordings is counter-productive to that effort. Any posts of this sort will be deleted without notification.

    Please try to avoid discussions that pit one format against another. Hint for new users: make liberal use of the search facilities here at QuadraphonicQuad. Our message base is an incredibly rich resource of detailed information on virtually all topics pertaining to surround-sound. You will be surprised at what you can find with a little digging!

Opeth - Ghost Reveries (Dolby DTS 5.1 DVD)

Rate the Audio-DVD of Opeth - GHOST REVERIES


  • Total voters
    14

Ge Someone

1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
1,154
Likes
9
Location
Netherlands
#2
Wow, a blast from the past (2006). This was the album I discovered Opeth by. I felt a little betrayed when just after I bought the CD they announced a surround DVD. Anyway, the surround mix was somewhat disappointing. Forget the center channel or the sub/LFE, But even as a 4.0 mix it did not do much except from giving the guitars a chance to get next to you.
The content (within the Opeth spectrum) still rates high, the surround mix could have been a lot more interesting. And later surround releases like Watershed or Still Life prove it.
 

DKA

1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
1,477
Likes
3
Location
The Nutmeg State
#3
4 out of 10 from me. "Big stereo" type of mix which added nothing to the experience of listening to the album itself.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
4,392
Likes
3,117
Location
The Land of Eternal Wildfires
#4
Voted 8. I feel the "big stereo" label is a bit unfair. There is quite a bit of discrete music here.
The "problem" is that the music coming from the front is incredibly dense most of the time.
Still, turn off your L&R and you got an alternate, very weird album.
It helped that I boosted my surrounds 1.5 db a piece.
Surroundy stuff emerges quite well from track 4 onward, when the band gets proggier.
If you like duh peth, get diss.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
1,709
Likes
7
Location
UK
#6
Voted 8. I feel the "big stereo" label is a bit unfair. There is quite a bit of discrete music here.
The "problem" is that the music coming from the front is incredibly dense most of the time.
Still, turn off your L&R and you got an alternate, very weird album.
It helped that I boosted my surrounds 1.5 db a piece.
Surroundy stuff emerges quite well from track 4 onward, when the band gets proggier.
If you like duh peth, get diss.
I have checked out the individual channels on Audacity; the big stereo label is accurate because that's what it is, literally 90% of the time. Real shame.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
1,709
Likes
7
Location
UK
#8
You checked every song? Because I heard more discreteness as the album went, as it got proggier.
Yes, there is a definite improvement on the last couple of tracks I agree. Such a great album deserved better, SW could of made this sound sublime.
 

bossfan

400 Club - QQ All Star
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Messages
520
Likes
183
Location
Canada
#18
I happened to pick this up very recently from my local used cd shop. It's the dvd - cd combo.. Although I own two other Opeth cds, this is the first with all theweird growling. I am certainly not into death metal and this growling stuff. Otherthan the growling, the music is okay. Not really mytaste but it's okay.. So, I am asking, why would a band with a good lead singer do this growling crap.. What's the point.. Where does it come from and who would it appeal to besides psychos. I imagine I am insulting a few people here who like this stuff, lol.. Don't take it personally. I just don't get the growling.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
4,392
Likes
3,117
Location
The Land of Eternal Wildfires
#19
The growly thing is just a direction music took. The rock and metal genres are constantly being pushed beyond existing limits, in one way or another. And perhaps growling taps in to something primal. Perhaps man kind could grunt like that before learning more articulate speech and singing.
Anyway, every generation experiences a lack of connection, at some point, with later music. It just "is what it is." There are so many factors that play in to what music one is drawn to and accepts.
A big part of it is what one's friends or potential mates/lovers are listening to and excited about. It's a common language and interest that can draw you together and give you connection.
Anyway, that's my take on why some accept growlies. While I do not prefer them, in the vast majority of cases, I do find them tolerable sometimes and appropriate to the music.
On the other hand, if I thought about it, I could cite singers that others think sound beautiful and very pleasant, but I think they just sound gutless, spineless and saccharine.
No accounting for taste, right?

P.s. what is your view of the "caveman" sections of various Mike Oldfield recordings (in particular the TB series)? Isn't that fun and interesting?
 

skherbeck

1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
2,043
Likes
2,628
Location
SoCal, USA
#20
Not a fan of Growling, although I've come to accept it with my discovery/love of Opeth (I also really enjoy Avenge Sevenfold's first album which is full of growls). That being said, there are moments on some Opeth songs where a well-placed long, low, guttural growl will get my inner-caveman growling right along!
 
Top