Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 69

Thread: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

  1. #26
    Member quadstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    31
    Points
    1,105
    Level
    18
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 95
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Anyone who would willingly take nearmono over surround would surely reach past the T-Bone steak for the hamburger.

  2. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New Plymouth, New Zealand
    Posts
    104
    Points
    2,858
    Level
    32
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 42
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by quadstone View Post
    Anyone who would willingly take nearmono over surround would surely reach past the T-Bone steak for the hamburger.
    Ah yes but is it better to eat hamburger than starve?

    Sometimes only the hamburger is available in Hi-Rez and sometimes, just sometimes, a well cooked hamburger beats a fatty, grissle laden steak hands down!

  3. #28
    Quad Goddess & Moderator Quad Linda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    DROP YOUR WAD ON QUAD Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    5,441
    Points
    192,348
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveSocial1 year registeredCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Let me use a different analogy: 2 Filet Mignon beats 4 crappy sawdust hamburgers. Perhaps I'm restating what OppoFood said. I would rather listen to 2ch seperates through 2 speakers than a Home Theater in a Box. I sold HTIB and have one that I inherited. Even QUALITY MONO trumps 4/5/6 transistor radios filling the room with slop.

    There are over 500 Quad LP's, over 200 Q8's (semi slop) and several hundred digital 5.1 mixes in my collection. There are others here that are as rabid as I am. I doubt anyone is more rabid about software. Thankfully, I have dozens of modes to synthesize Quad/5.1. Yet, NOTHING beats the real McCoy.

    Sure, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. More is not better. Lifelike is better. The typical 21st Century "hi-fi" is ear buds or computer speakers. Most people today have no clue that music can sound real. You CAN have it all! Killer fidelity in 4/5/6 channels. If modern seperates are beyond your budget, buy some vintage Quad gear. It's better than ALL the entry level modern stuff. Or would you prefer 4 computer speakers?

    Linda


    Quote Originally Posted by quadstone View Post
    Anyone who would willingly take nearmono over surround would surely reach past the T-Bone steak for the hamburger.
    KWAD KITTY

  4. #29
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star Doug G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Rochester, Minnesota
    Posts
    1,080
    Points
    9,132
    Level
    64
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 218
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Hehe. I guess when I started this thread, I didn't envision myself becoming hungry while reading through it.

    Except hungry for more quad.

    I am going to my mother's today and I just know there are some T-bones there waiting to be grilled...



    Doug

  5. #30
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    15
    Points
    1,272
    Level
    19
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 28
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Hi,
    Good posts here in this thread.
    I think the main difference between 2 ch folk and surround folk is that 2 channel is the "default".
    A lot of people I know think surround sound in music is a one off novelty.
    I know people who have a real music collection and for whom listening to music is a part of everday life that for example have never heard of the SACD format.
    I think surround fans are those that show an interest in what is available both in terms of hardware (equipment) and music ( formats etc), from this position of knowledge and experience we then have decided that we generally prefer surround to stereo, when given a choice.
    CV

  6. #31
    Quad Goddess & Moderator Quad Linda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    DROP YOUR WAD ON QUAD Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    5,441
    Points
    192,348
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveSocial1 year registeredCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    The reason we buy 2ch software is "DEFAULT" of inept marketing, competing formats, and lack of public awareness of surround. ALL TITLES RECORDED IN THE LAST 50 YEARS SHOULD BE AVAILABLE AS MULTICHANNEL! Til then, go synthesize.

    Linda
    Get the Sound Around You

    Quote Originally Posted by ChickenVenus View Post
    Hi,
    Good posts here in this thread.
    I think the main difference between 2 ch folk and surround folk is that 2 channel is the "default".
    A lot of people I know think surround sound in music is a one off novelty.
    I know people who have a real music collection and for whom listening to music is a part of everday life that for example have never heard of the SACD format.
    I think surround fans are those that show an interest in what is available both in terms of hardware (equipment) and music ( formats etc), from this position of knowledge and experience we then have decided that we generally prefer surround to stereo, when given a choice.
    CV
    KWAD KITTY

  7. #32
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2
    Points
    4
    Level
    1
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 46
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Firesign theater! I actually had a legitimate dvda of theirs. Listened to it a couple of times and sold it.

  8. #33
    I can do anything! LizardKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,652
    Points
    22,463
    Level
    93
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 887
    Overall activity: 40.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveVeteranCreated Album pictures10000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    My theories about this is that the difference between "nearmono" people and true surround officianados is that surround officianados actaully listen more for the detail in music, or like to hear individual instruments - I think quite often because we have a music background in one way or another, e.g. having been in a band (or played an instrument) makes us more consciously (or unconsciously) listen to what the other instrument were doing...

  9. #34
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star Doug G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Rochester, Minnesota
    Posts
    1,080
    Points
    9,132
    Level
    64
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 218
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by boondocks View Post
    I have always wondered why some people are/were instantly drawn to surround sound and most could care less.
    When I first saw quad equipment I bought in (literally bought equipment) before I ever actually heard it! It just struck me intuitively that it had to be better.
    Whether that was influenced by attending so many concerts, I'm not sure, but it just seemed "right".
    Reading through again, I saw this and wondered, is there anybody here who wasn't instantly floored by quad/surround? Did it have to grow on you?

    Because the very first time I heard quad, I thought, "That's IT!" And it really wasn't so much a thought as an instinct kicking in. And, like boondocks, even before I heard it, I remember reading about it and thinking, "Wow! Four amps and four speakers!"

    I knew that's the way it HAD to be and immediately started working toward having it.

    The term "Quadraphonics" became a magic word.

    Oh, and another good point Mr. Morris... I mean LizardKing.

    Doug

  10. #35
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star wavelength's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,177
    Points
    9,814
    Level
    66
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 236
    Overall activity: 56.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug G. View Post
    Reading through again, I saw this and wondered, is there anybody here who wasn't instantly floored by quad/surround? Did it have to grow on you?

    Because the very first time I heard quad, I thought, "That's IT!" And it really wasn't so much a thought as an instinct kicking in. And, like boondocks, even before I heard it, I remember reading about it and thinking, "Wow! Four amps and four speakers!"

    I knew that's the way it HAD to be and immediately started working toward having it.
    I got into dvd-audio stereo first and even though, of course, the discs came with 5.1, I resisted going that route for quite a while. One day one of my sons convinced me to hook up his 5.1 receiver to some extra speakers we had. We put on a disc and we didn't want to move. We were glued to the sound that we were hearing. A profound life-changing moment.

  11. #36
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,494
    Points
    7,203
    Level
    56
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 147
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug G. View Post
    Reading through again, I saw this and wondered, is there anybody here who wasn't instantly floored by quad/surround? Did it have to grow on you?
    My first experience happened when I was in college and a friend had a Bose HT system in his room. We were listening to "The Downward Spiral" in DPL and started noticing that little music box at the beginning of "Closer" more pronounced in a rear speaker I've always said I've been chasing that moment ever since.

    That's also how you become a surround fan without really being around, due to age, for the Quad era.

  12. #37
    Uh-Oh, Here Comes 2014! Ed Bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Lost in a Lost World
    Posts
    3,139
    Points
    33,100
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry25000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    There is no logic. The same person who will enjoy the full multichannel sound experience at the cinema or on DVD/Blu-Ray at home seems to have no interest in audio-only MC. Simple as that.


    ED

  13. Likes Quad Linda liked this post
  14. #38
    Quad Goddess & Moderator Quad Linda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    DROP YOUR WAD ON QUAD Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    5,441
    Points
    192,348
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveSocial1 year registeredCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    I've been saying that since I joined QQ. I've seen it firsthand in selling this stuff. With Quad, the reluctance came from either the expense or competing formats. Everyone said wow and was interested. Back then, ALL our custmers loved music. That's the difference.

    Perhaps the name of this thread should be "what's the difference between 2ch and mono people?" One post might cover it: NOTHING. World gone mad.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Bishop View Post
    There is no logic. The same person who will enjoy the full multichannel sound experience at the cinema or on DVD/Blu-Ray at home seems to have no interest in audio-only MC. Simple as that.


    ED
    KWAD KITTY

  15. #39
    900 Club - QQ All Star Ge Someone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    998
    Points
    10,619
    Level
    68
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 231
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger Second Class10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    On a surround (4.0-5.1) system the stereo should sound equally good. The front L+R are the corner stones of every decent music listening setup. You can compromise on the size of rears to a certain extend if the (room) situation calls for it.

    Once you have that surround setup for music, you will enjoy films (movies) a lot more too. In my opinion a center and sub are not mandatory for music (as long as you stay somewhere in the sweetspot) if you have good FL+FR, but I prefer to have a center speaker (especially with movies).

    Conclusion: surround people can have it all.

  16. #40
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star Doug G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Rochester, Minnesota
    Posts
    1,080
    Points
    9,132
    Level
    64
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 218
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    DKA, I hope I didn't seem to imply one had to be around during the original quad era to be hit by multi-channel because I didn't mean it that way. Your experience is exactly what I was talking about. Stuff coming out of those back speakers makes your head spin around and you say to yourself, "That's what I want!" It's a delight!

    Same with your experience with your son, wavelength.

    And Ed and Linda, I know what you're talking about too but some people these days just automatically tie multi-channel in with movies and don't really even consider listening to music that way. To me, it is a strange mindset.

    They still stubbornly have that, "I only have two ears" attitude which is, of course, senseless.

    Ge, you make sense too. With me, it is more of a secondary thing that I listen to movies through my quad system (and it is fantastic) but music is THE main reason for it.

    Doug

  17. #41
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    129
    Points
    1,582
    Level
    22
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 18
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    I think much of the resistance to surround music and movies comes from people's resistance to stuff that doesn't 'just work' (you could say Apple has influenced that expectation somewhat). Surround done right is a complicated endeavor. With stereo you can pretty much set two speakers nearly anywhere, wedge your body in the middle of them, push play, and yer done! I love surround obviously or I wouldn't be here. But as much as I enjoyed it, I can say that the learning curve was a bit steep to get it done right. Speaker set up isn't an easy thing. There are 8 billion schools of thought on where 5 speakers should be placed, what angle they should edge toward, and if you google surround speaker set up you will see there is not a single go to formula to use. Despite loving the format, I'd say it was at least a year before I understood enough about surround to put my speakers in the right place, calibrate them accurately, ect. It was really only quite recently that all my ducks were lined up and I can safely say I don't need to set up my speakers again. It changed (the set up) my entire perception of the same material I'd been listening to. Suddenly pans were more geometric and even lossy formats like DTS and DD sounded like a more unified whole rather than a collection of sounds emerging from the speakers. I'm less concerned about how much is going on in the rears than how the whole piece sounds synergistically. Anyway I believe this is the biggest barrier. Sure consumers can and are buying HTIB's and such. But if they have one speaker on a bookshelf at 5' another at 3' and the surrounds wherever they will fit they are probably not getting that much from the experience anyway. And that is the level of the average consumer. Sure, some of the modern AVRs have the auto set up routine which does work. But if the speakers aren't set up correctly to begin with, this is not going to be very satisfying. For others their entry into the surround market comes thru cinema. Which is fine. But when the dynamic range of most movies is so far removed from the dynamic range of music we hear constantly from these folks about how they can't hear the dialogue of the movie. So they take to turning up the center which will kill the mix of some surround music. It obviously not only anchors dialogue, but also some of the phantom psychoacoustic effects in mc music. I personally think the average consumer would only conclude the whole thing to be more trouble than it is worth. I'm not sure they are not incorrect. I have a lot of surround music, but it is literally a small single digit percentage of my entire music catalog. There are a few albums that certainly justify the experience in my mind but boy what a journey to get there. It isn't as easy as buying 4/5/6 speakers and popping in a piece of music. Just saying. I personally think my Mom for example might enjoy surround music. Would she be able to set up a system to play that music? Not in a million years. And she is not alone. That said were someone to Apple-fy the experience of surround in so much that one could set the whole thing up with little user interaction, put the speakers wherever their lifestyle choices dictated, and had legacy capabilities for current material, who knows it might take off more than it has. Perhaps the object oriented stuff from dolby might be helpful. I think it more likely that surround won't take off until the actual speakers are removed from the equation. I see steerable sound arrays based on real time information about the listeners position and beamed directly to ears will be the thing that drives wide adoption. It won't be with the coffin boxes we have now. Not too many folks are willing to put speakers nearly their size in their living room simply for good bass response! Even for people who come over and are blown away by this or that surround experience I've yet to have anyone be so convinced that they went out and bought a surround system. I can't remember now why I went down that road. I'd only heard surround on matrixed computer speakers before I purchase a real system. I'm still puzzled that I had interest in the format after hearing it that way. Glad I did though. As Linda put it, it's difficult to eat sawdust after you've had food.

  18. Likes LizardKing liked this post
  19. #42
    Quad Goddess & Moderator Quad Linda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    DROP YOUR WAD ON QUAD Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    5,441
    Points
    192,348
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveSocial1 year registeredCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Doug, I've had the ability to play movies in surround for 30 years. I don't do it often. I own perhaps 300 DVD's and 100 Blu-Rays. Only a handful are movies. Of course, the rest are all about music.

    Bleedink, you made some EXCELLENT points. My philospohy in setting up the speakers is to first adjust the image with only the fronts on, ala binoculars. Once the image is in focus, I'll set up the rears as close to that as the primary listening area allows. It works. To have speakers at different heights, or some horizontal and some vertical simply creates a mess. My two main systems are floor standing, so the "toe-in" is the main concern. Although four of the same speakers aren't necessary, I do advocate it where possible.

    Most people who buy HTIB think they're buying something great. They're the equivalent of '70's compact systems. Mid-fi at best. I have a Sony HTIB that I inherited. I never play it. It does play SACD, although surround and compatibility are the only real benefits.

    Many people assume that they can play their 2ch CD's and have them come out as surround on their home theater. Or, it's close enough. I've been sold on synthesizing since '71. Yet, that pales in comparison to a great discrete mix.

    Sorry to say that a small percentage of my collection is surround. Yet, I own nearly 1000 Quad/surround audio-only titles. I have ALWAYS bought EVERYTHING I enjoy in Quad/surround. Often, that means buying something for the second, or even the tenth time. Record labels LOVE me! Even if the surround mix is just echo, I've always had the option of playing the title as 2ch, which I do with many rear echo titles. I ALWAYS play "discrete" mixes as surround.

    DKA, although "you shoulda been around back then" is great nostalgia, it isn't necessary. It does provide a few things like a good reference point, an understanding of what a good Quad mix is (what most 5.1 engineers have missed), and experiencing Quad being "all the rage" for a short while. Doug is correct. You don't need that point of reference to understand and enjoy surround sound. So, sit back, pour a microbrew, or whatever you like, and enjoy surround in all its' glory.
    KWAD KITTY

  20. #43
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star wavelength's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,177
    Points
    9,814
    Level
    66
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 236
    Overall activity: 56.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleedink View Post
    Not too many folks are willing to put speakers nearly their size in their living room simply for good bass response! Even for people who come over and are blown away by this or that surround experience I've yet to have anyone be so convinced that they went out and bought a surround system.
    Key point as to why most people don't get surround systems for listening to music.

  21. #44
    I can do anything! LizardKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,652
    Points
    22,463
    Level
    93
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 887
    Overall activity: 40.0%
    Achievements:
    OverdriveVeteranCreated Album pictures10000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleedink View Post
    ..... Not too many folks are willing to put speakers nearly their size in their living room simply for good bass response! Even for people who come over and are blown away by this or that surround experience I've yet to have anyone be so convinced that they went out and bought a surround system. ......
    All good points....

    A friend got a surround set-up a while back - but unfortunately only with satellite speakers . They got it for movies - I'd been trying to convince them about getting into surround music. I helped them calibrate it, and brought over a few discs. I spun up Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots, and they were blown away!!! I think once they heard it in their environment - they really listened for the first time.

  22. #45
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star 0tto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,261
    Points
    14,110
    Level
    77
    Level completed: 15%, Points required for next Level: 340
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesVeteran10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by Bleedink View Post
    Not too many folks are willing to put speakers nearly their size in their living room simply for good bass response! Even for people who come over and are blown away by this or that surround experience I've yet to have anyone be so convinced that they went out and bought a surround system.
    i cannot fully agree with this point.
    i believe main reason 'cause very low awareness of the masses about an existence of music in surround format.
    no one here would argue that consumers, who's hunting down surround titles, pretty small percentage of general
    consumer base and mainly consist an older generation, from which even smaller percentage still have interests for
    music.
    majority of present consumers consist younger generation which for most part indifferent to musical genres of
    60-70-80th. but top sellers at the moment from main stream of genres in fact doesn't offer anything to their fans
    in surround or even stereo but well mastered in HiRes formats. they know that chances to remain on top for long
    time pretty slim and have single motivation - make as cheap, as possible and grab the cash as much as you can.
    the music industry also did nothing in past neither present to educate consumers. so we have the loop which led
    us to nowhere.

  23. #46
    900 Club - QQ All Star dr8track's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    980
    Points
    16,156
    Level
    81
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 194
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger Second Class10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug G. View Post
    Reading through again, I saw this and wondered, is there anybody here who wasn't instantly floored by quad/surround? Did it have to grow on you?
    I was fascinated with the idea of quad before I ever had a chance to even hear it. I grew up in a tiny town in Eastern Oregon and there were definitely no stereo stores where you could go to preview equipment or recordings. I first read about quad. I don't even know where, but I do know that I was hooked on the concept as soon as I read about it. Maybe my fascination had to do with growing up on records. The original records my older sister and brother played were mono recordings. I remember how amazed I was by the separation in stereo recordings when my mom got me stereo record player. I think it was all that time I spent in my bedroom listening to stereo albums and being so amazed by how great it was to hear the stereo mixes. So, the concept of doubling that separation by going quad was a concept I could not resist. I found a quadraphoic 8 track player in either Sears or Wards mail order catalog and placed the order. It was a Toyo Quadio 8 track car player. I joined the Columbia Quadraphonic Tape Club and ordered my first quad 8 tracks. They were Jeff Beck, Edgar Winter They Only Come Out At Night, Janis Joplin Pearl, can't recall the others. When I got that quad tape deck installed (by my buddies, we didn't have the luxury of car stereo shops) in my 67 Camaro I totally fell in love with surround sound music. Frankenstein by Edgar Winter in the confines of a Camaro was a pretty wild surround experience. That was around 1971 or 72. I've been fascinated with multi channel music ever since.
    http://KeepOnTrackin.webs.com Obsolete Audio Technology For A New Millennium

  24. Likes Quad Linda liked this post
  25. #47
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star leevitalone1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,505
    Points
    16,409
    Level
    82
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 441
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Blog entrySocial10000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    I read thru all the answers and no one has stated the obvious. quad people have 4 ears. and stereo peole have only two.
    simple!
    The divorce was my fault, I just couldn't get along with her boyfriends.

  26. #48
    New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8
    Points
    1,235
    Level
    19
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 65
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredTagger Second Class1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    I think I fall somewhere between two chairs. I own, listen and enjoy all of the following systems, mono, stereo, orthoperspecta and quadraphonic. Mono and 2-channel stereo are missing the depth, so the last round is between orthoperspecta and quad. Orthoperspecta has one front speaker and two side (not back) speakers. Because of mono front channel it is obviously missing the left-right difference and it is working perfectly only with stereo records recorded by MS microphone setup. But depth and ambience is there and side speakers doesn't sound unnatural, they are only doing what they are supposed to do, creating the depth and space. Quad is also nice, but sounds from behind doesn't sound right in music (IMHO, of course). But when there's no direct sound coming from the back speakers, only reflections from the concert hall walls etc. then quad is like better version of orthoperspecta with stereophonic front channels.
    Last edited by mikko1200; 05-07-2012 at 06:08 AM.
    Sansui QRX-7001, Salora Stereo 3000 Orthoperspecta

  27. #49
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,494
    Points
    7,203
    Level
    56
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 147
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by leevitalone1 View Post
    I read thru all the answers and no one has stated the obvious. quad people have 4 ears. and stereo peole have only two.
    simple!
    So where do us 5.1 people stick the fifth ear?

  28. #50
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star leevitalone1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,505
    Points
    16,409
    Level
    82
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 441
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Blog entrySocial10000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Difference Between Quad People and 2 Channel People

    Quote Originally Posted by DKA View Post
    So where do us 5.1 people stick the fifth ear?
    That my friend is the "Sweet spot!" it's the Phantom ear.
    5th beer/ not 4th I'm on now.
    Last edited by leevitalone1; 05-09-2012 at 04:51 PM.
    The divorce was my fault, I just couldn't get along with her boyfriends.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •