Thanks Thanks:  18
Likes Likes:  32

View Poll Results: Rate the SACD of Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE

Voters
79. You may not vote on this poll
  • 10: Great Surround, Great Fidelity, Great Content

    44 55.70%
  • 9:

    18 22.78%
  • 8:

    11 13.92%
  • 7:

    4 5.06%
  • 6:

    0 0%
  • 5:

    1 1.27%
  • 4:

    1 1.27%
  • 3:

    0 0%
  • 2:

    0 0%
  • 1: Poor Surround, Poor Fidelity, Poor Content

    0 0%
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 135

Thread: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

  1. #1
    Board Operator JonUrban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    13,225
    Points
    1,136,067
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranOverdriveCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry
    Post Thanks / Like

    5.1 icon Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Please post your thoughts and comments on the SACD release of "Wish You Were Here" by Pink Floyd. Comments on the Blu-Ray release of this title should be made in the Blu-Ray thread.

    Thanks

    WYWH SACD 700 Front.jpg
    WYWH SACD 700 Back.jpg
    :-jon

  2. Likes Simon A liked this post
  3. #2
    400 Club - QQ All Star spenceo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    430
    Points
    18,467
    Level
    86
    Level completed: 24%, Points required for next Level: 383
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsSocial
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    As I said in the Blu-ray section, I can't believe how clean and crisp this is. By far, the most "crankable" of all the WYWH's

    Spence
    Powered by:

  4. #3
    Board Operator JonUrban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    13,225
    Points
    1,136,067
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranOverdriveCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    NOTE: Added scans of the front and back of the package. Very cool case!
    :-jon

  5. Likes Simon A liked this post
  6. #4
    900 Club - QQ All Star dr. simple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    957
    Points
    15,797
    Level
    80
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 53
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    I listened to this today, top to bottom, and I must say it's quite remarkable. Wonderful. No complaints. Must have.
    "You gotta always remember, the name of the game is 'What does it sound like?' That's always the end result - I don't care if you got 90 tracks. What does it sound like, baby?" - Ray Charles

  7. #5
    400 Club - QQ All Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Toyland
    Posts
    409
    Points
    6,525
    Level
    52
    Level completed: 88%, Points required for next Level: 25
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    After spending a good bit of time listening to this mix, DSOTM 5.1 and an assortment of Steven Wilson mixes, I'd have to say that I prefer Wilson's work somewhat more. With the James Guthrie mixes, I find myself enhancing them with a matrix overlay of Logic 7 especially DSOTM . (My receiver can do this.) I prefer Wilson's mixes with no such enhancement; and applying the Logic 7 overlay is actually detrimental. But I look at this all as two artists with different styles, each excellent in their own way. So I rate this version of WYWH as a solid 10/10 on a whole taking into sound quality, the overall mix and aural experience. It was well worth the wait.

  8. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    28
    Points
    5,094
    Level
    45
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 56
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Sir,

    You need to listen to each channel individually. What you will hear will shock you and explain why you need to throw logic effect at a supposed surround mix.


    Quote Originally Posted by ar surround View Post
    After spending a good bit of time listening to this mix, DSOTM 5.1 and an assortment of Steven Wilson mixes, I'd have to say that I prefer Wilson's work somewhat more. With the James Guthrie mixes, I find myself enhancing them with a matrix overlay of Logic 7 especially DSOTM . (My receiver can do this.) I prefer Wilson's mixes with no such enhancement; and applying the Logic 7 overlay is actually detrimental. But I look at this all as two artists with different styles, each excellent in their own way. So I rate this version of WYWH as a solid 10/10 on a whole taking into sound quality, the overall mix and aural experience. It was well worth the wait.

  9. #7
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star wavelength's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    2,500
    Points
    22,010
    Level
    92
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 340
    Overall activity: 67.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Quote Originally Posted by britre View Post
    Sir,

    You need to listen to each channel individually. What you will hear will shock you and explain why you need to throw logic effect at a supposed surround mix.
    This sounds like a reference to a thread (Wish You Were Here SACD 5.1) over at the SurroundSound Google Group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/surroundsound They are discussing the idea that the mix is fake.

  10. #8
    900 Club - QQ All Star dr. simple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    957
    Points
    15,797
    Level
    80
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 53
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Quote Originally Posted by wavelength View Post
    This sounds like a reference to a thread (Wish You Were Here SACD 5.1) over at the SurroundSound Google Group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/surroundsound They are discussing the idea that the mix is fake.
    I don't care how it was made; the fact is, there are very discrete elements that can't be disputed. More importantly, it sounds great. I differ to the Ray Charles quote I have used as my signature...
    "You gotta always remember, the name of the game is 'What does it sound like?' That's always the end result - I don't care if you got 90 tracks. What does it sound like, baby?" - Ray Charles

  11. #9
    900 Club - QQ All Star dr. simple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    957
    Points
    15,797
    Level
    80
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 53
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    I'll be the first to agree that everybody has a right to their opinion, but I am baffled as to why anyone would rate this at 1.
    "You gotta always remember, the name of the game is 'What does it sound like?' That's always the end result - I don't care if you got 90 tracks. What does it sound like, baby?" - Ray Charles

  12. #10
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star wavelength's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    2,500
    Points
    22,010
    Level
    92
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 340
    Overall activity: 67.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranOverdrive10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Quote Originally Posted by dr. simple View Post
    I'll be the first to agree that everybody has a right to their opinion, but I am baffled as to why anyone would rate this at 1.
    I'm guessing but if you thought it was a fake mix then you'd probably be ticked off enough to give it a 1.

  13. #11
    600 Club - QQ All Star georgeshannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    651
    Points
    10,708
    Level
    68
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 142
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesVeteran10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    I rated the SACD Wish You Were Here as a 9 overall.

    The sound quality is better than any other version I’ve heard but it sounds like it came from 40 year old analog tapes and for that reason I rate the sound as a 9.5. At the beginning of track 4 - Wish You Were Here when the chair creaks and you can hear the steel guitar strings bend you’re convinced this sound quality is better than the rest. On the Q8 version of this recording, those details are lost in the wow, flutter, and hiss.

    The mix, however, is a bit conservative given the amount of art the musicians gave Mr. Guthrie to work with. Elliot Scheiner or Steven Wilson would have mixed this as a 10. Still, each channel contains different information than each of the other 5 channels. That does make it a real 5.1 mix. Its not intended as a quad mix. I rate the mix as a 9.
    Best regards,
    George


  14. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    28
    Points
    5,094
    Level
    45
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 56
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Don't take my word for it, listen to each channel individually. Fake is an incorrect term, if you took the $11.99 red book reissue and ran it through a surround decoder you would have the exact same mix this one is and not be $35-$125 dollars lighter. The proof is indeed in how it sounds. And if you believe derrived stereo mixes are 5.1 surround more power to you. It just does not put a good feeling in your stomach to pay lots of hard earned cash to have something you could create on your own with existing equipment....

  15. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    28
    Points
    5,094
    Level
    45
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 56
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Not to blow your point but the master is 36 years old tops, not 40. And you may be right, Steve Wilson would have possibly made a discreet 5.1 mix not a Dolby surround mix. The Quad version on the DVD has more detail and feeling then the 5.1 could ever have due to the surround method used. If you want a good stereo version on a digital format the Columbia 24 bit SBM cd is the way to go. It will make you throw this garbage away, seriously. It will cost you just as much too considering there are few to be had.

    Quote Originally Posted by georgeshannon View Post
    I rated the SACD Wish You Were Here as a 9 overall.

    The sound quality is better than any other version I’ve heard but it sounds like it came from 40 year old analog tapes and for that reason I rate the sound as a 9.5. At the beginning of track 4 - Wish You Were Here when the chair creaks and you can hear the steel guitar strings bend you’re convinced this sound quality is better than the rest. On the Q8 version of this recording, those details are lost in the wow, flutter, and hiss.

    The mix, however, is a bit conservative given the amount of art the musicians gave Mr. Guthrie to work with. Elliot Scheiner or Steven Wilson would have mixed this as a 10. Still, each channel contains different information than each of the other 5 channels. That does make it a real 5.1 mix. Its not intended as a quad mix. I rate the mix as a 9.

  16. #14
    Senior Member patrick1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Hinsdale, Illinois
    Posts
    263
    Points
    6,168
    Level
    51
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 182
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Created Blog entryVeteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Hello. Played this over and over this past week. Whilst it sounds great, I, personally would've wanted something more out of the 5.1 mix. Maybe because my ears have been Wilson-ized with all of his mixes being released. IMO. Thanks.

  17. #15
    300 Club - QQ All Star Felix E. Martinez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    333
    Points
    9,892
    Level
    66
    Level completed: 61%, Points required for next Level: 158
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Wonderful, with none of the vocal EQ harshness that plagued the Guthrie DSOTM 5.1 mix. Really surprised by the mastering too. What a treat!

  18. #16
    Member Time Lord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Perth Australia
    Posts
    168
    Points
    5,626
    Level
    48
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 124
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Britre are you a troll. Sorry to hijack the thread, I don't even have the SACD of WYWH I have the blu-ray from the box set, a 5.1 mix that I enjoy greatly. Firstly you rate this a 1 then you have insulted James Guthrie and Steven Wilson, are you going to have a go at Elliot Scheiner next. Find something constructive to say or find a forum for surround haters to rant to.
    He who laughs last.......thinks slowest

  19. #17
    New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1
    Points
    166
    Level
    3
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 34
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    31 days registered100 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Can people explain which surround version is best?
    I love the dark side of the moon sacd in 5.1. Is the wish you were here sacd similar in quality to that? Is the quad still the best mix?

    Please don't tell me the sacd sounds just like the stereo version, I will cry.

    The reviews here say its amazing:
    http://sa-cd.net/showtitle/7523

    But reviews here say it's hard to distinguish from a stereo mix:
    http://groups.google.com/group/surro...99fbacb7&pli=1

  20. #18
    Member bangsezmax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    181
    Points
    9,827
    Level
    66
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 223
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Duplicate post

  21. #19
    Board Operator JonUrban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    13,225
    Points
    1,136,067
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranOverdriveCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Guys. You are making this thread a joke. I am going to have to move all of these non-topic threads outta here. Once I figure out what I'm going to do with them, they're gone. Please stay on topic.

    You are totally free to start new threads in the appropriate forum sections to discuss any of the above issues in their own place. 2 years from now, someone looking for info on this SACD is not going to give a shit about Aqualung distortion, Steve Wilson, or who bought what in the '70s.
    :-jon

  22. Thanks Simon A thanked for this post
    Likes Simon A liked this post
  23. #20
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    in your face
    Posts
    1,863
    Points
    20,308
    Level
    89
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 42
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Quote Originally Posted by bangsezmax View Post
    The first scenario gives me pause. The second one does to a lesser extent. I looked at the waveforms posted from the other thread and the fronts and rears on the 5.1 really do look pretty same-y. That may have been Guthrie's preference. But I'd really like to know what's going on there.
    Samey , but not the same. There are clearly part differences and level differences between corresponding front and surround channels -- compare those channels on track WYWH_5.1split-002 (Welcome to the Machine, I presume) for example.

    it's obvious too that Guthrie has chosen to populate the Center and SUB channels minimally; this is a not-unheard of 5.1 mixing choice (and one I applaud for the SUB channel). I like an active Center, but some artists are averse to having their lead vocal isolated in the center ....and we know PF had some input into this mix.

    Agreed that Guthrie's commentary on this mix will be interesting, if we ever get to see any.

  24. #21
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6
    Points
    1,237
    Level
    19
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 63
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Ok... I'm not new here...lurked for years. Brian is not trying to be a troll. I don't go so far as Brian, but I understand what he means. The mix is great sounding (crystal clear, amazing detail, etc), but its not very bounce around the roomy. Media interviews have suggested that Guthrie was trying to replicate the stereo mix's overall sound in 5.1 format. I think he achieved that, but in the process there are very few instances where what is in one speaker isn't at least partly (if not greatly) in other speakers as well. This means that the majority of the discrete effects that are present come off with the level of discreteness that a Prologic decoder might be able to provide. Brian thinks this is a sign of a fake job. I think it was mixed that way on purpose. When this was mixed back in 2003-5(?) there were no plans to release the Quad side by side. Unfortunately releasing it thus here shows how indiscrete the 5.1 mix is (overall). This is a quad forum. (I believe) We like our surround to be more engaging. For Brian, the Guthrie mix does not fit the bill. For me... I love the quad mix.
    S

  25. #22
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Nutmeg State
    Posts
    1,514
    Points
    10,194
    Level
    67
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 256
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranRecommendation Second Class10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Quote Originally Posted by Sthunderrocker View Post
    Ok... I'm not new here...lurked for years. Brian is not trying to be a troll. I don't go so far as Brian, but I understand what he means. The mix is great sounding (crystal clear, amazing detail, etc), but its not very bounce around the roomy. Media interviews have suggested that Guthrie was trying to replicate the stereo mix's overall sound in 5.1 format. I think he achieved that, but in the process there are very few instances where what is in one speaker isn't at least partly (if not greatly) in other speakers as well. This means that the majority of the discrete effects that are present come off with the level of discreteness that a Prologic decoder might be able to provide. Brian thinks this is a sign of a fake job. I think it was mixed that way on purpose. When this was mixed back in 2003-5(?) there were no plans to release the Quad side by side. Unfortunately releasing it thus here shows how indiscrete the 5.1 mix is (overall). This is a quad forum. (I believe) We like our surround to be more engaging. For Brian, the Guthrie mix does not fit the bill. For me... I love the quad mix.
    S
    I think a whole lot of things about this..

    - I do not consider the presence of overlapping information in other channels to be a weakness in a mix. I think holding back from providing complete discreteness can fulfill many functions, the most important being creating a more "full" mix or allowing for holes in the soundfield to be better filled. I think there are better ways to do this, though, than what Guthrie did. Guthrie was too conservative with this mix, though, with the presence of as much lead vocal audible behind the listener on "Have a Cigar" than there is in the center an example of that.

    - The idea of "presenting the stereo's mix in a 5.1 format" is one I don't understand when coming from professional mixers and producers. This is not what I want when I'm buying something put out from a record company. Very few mixers understand this. Steve Wilson does. That's for sure. To use this as an excuse as to why this, or the "Moving Pictures" mix, pulls too many punches, is not something I can be easily sold on.

    - The quad, as presented in this package, has its share of flaws itself, and almost goes too far in the other direction, plus sounded rather unbalanced to me.

    - That being said, I do firmly believe the mix is derived from multitracks, and that this simply was an artistic choice done by Mr. Guthrie. For what it is, I enjoyed the clean sound of it and feel it more than has its moments. In the end, though, he didn't do what I wish he would have. That's fine. Others are going to feel differently, and more power to them. I don't think anything is being misrepresented.

    - I'll never understand why people choose to isolate channels on a mix when listening. The idea of a surround mix is for the channels to psychoacoustically interact with each other and produce a "surround" experience when sitting in the sweet spot. Isolating channels and looking for imperfections is just looking for something not to like in a mix. I'm more of a "glass half full" kind of guy than that.

    - I have never believed this to be a "quad" forum. The name on the marquee says "Multichannel music past, present, and future." I've said this before and I'll say it again: I personally do not care about older quad recordings for the most part. I was in diapers when most of them came out, and very rarely do I encounter a transfer that I honestly enjoy. This, however, is the largest surround community that I know of, and the overlap between "modern surround enthusiast" and "grew up on quad as a kid" is rather large. There's room for everyone here.

    - People who are going to point fingers and say "fake" need to do a lot of listening as to what "fake" sounds like in 2011. It's not the crap you heard ten years ago, or what Silverline was putting out. People make baseless opinions all the time as to what "derived from stereo" sounds like, and a whole lot of them need to do their research before opening their mouths. From a crispness standpoint, though, hey, I wish some of what I do from stereo sounded as good as Guthrie's mix.

  26. Likes Simon A liked this post
  27. #23
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6
    Points
    1,237
    Level
    19
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 63
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Nicely put.
    S

  28. #24
    Board Operator JonUrban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    13,225
    Points
    1,136,067
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranOverdriveCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    Honestly, a '1' vote?

    Rating it as "Poor Surround, Poor Fidelity, Poor Content", I find that hard to believe. To each his own, but a '1' vote would mean that the surround was poor, the audio fidelity really sucked, and the material was horrible. Even if you hate the Guthrie mix, rating this a '1' says it sounds like shit and the musical content is worthless.

    Really?
    :-jon

  29. Thanks JediJoker thanked for this post
  30. #25
    Board Operator JonUrban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    13,225
    Points
    1,136,067
    Level
    100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranOverdriveCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Pink Floyd - WISH YOU WERE HERE [SACD]

    NOTE: The "lively" discussion on mixing for 5.1 (or not mixing) has been moved here:

    http://www.quadraphonicquad.com/foru...read.php?15203

    This post will self-destruct in a few days.

    HEY NOW!
    :-jon

  31. Likes Simon A liked this post
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •