Deathbed
New member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2012
- Messages
- 2
This first part is not a question and tonight I've come across something amazing and beautiful- Electric Ladyland was pinched from quad in to stereo by reducing the stereo of image of the front to 50 to -50 and the rear 50/-50 to 180/-180. I'm an actual "self taught" Mastering Engineer..lol...well I've been working on recording since the 486 PC back in the day and I've been tinkering with a program called Lasso to up my priority on Adobe Audition 3 and things are jumping quickly.
My question is: I want people to hear the dts's that I'm working hard on with Electric Ladyland, I ripped from a purchased CD, but does it do justice to the quad market? Is it legal or justified to release privately made material that sounds better than what the "Recording Company" can provide? I'm just wondering how many people who have bought an album or print don't have the right to soup it up and get stuck in that "No one is making money" legality when an alteration or copy is made that is for a hobbyist? This is a hobby right? Can we legally alter our collection of audio and release it privately?
Just wondering thank you.
My question is: I want people to hear the dts's that I'm working hard on with Electric Ladyland, I ripped from a purchased CD, but does it do justice to the quad market? Is it legal or justified to release privately made material that sounds better than what the "Recording Company" can provide? I'm just wondering how many people who have bought an album or print don't have the right to soup it up and get stuck in that "No one is making money" legality when an alteration or copy is made that is for a hobbyist? This is a hobby right? Can we legally alter our collection of audio and release it privately?
Just wondering thank you.