Might have had a winner here if they'd included either the unreleased Quad mixes of B,S&T 3 and 4 or offered up modern 5.1 remixes of the same. No dice?
No sale.
Were quad mixes actually done of the 3rd and 4th albums?
Might have had a winner here if they'd included either the unreleased Quad mixes of B,S&T 3 and 4 or offered up modern 5.1 remixes of the same. No dice?
No sale.
Ditto. 'Lukewarm' on the heels of Audio Fidelity's recent QUAD/5.1 SACDs of BS&T and Child Is Father To The Man, which, IMO, are exceptional* and paying $75 each for 3 and 4 in STEREO when Quad masters do exist is outrageously in poor taste.
As per usual with Analogue Productions.........they also charge you for the freakin' box!
[* I paid about $22 delivered for each AF SACD and not $37.50 each which is AP's asking price]. So, by my calculations, AP is charging $30 for each SACD and $30 for the [friggin'] box....and it doesn't even come with Chocolates!:yikes
BLOODLINES, Huh............ Should be called :yikesSUCKING BLOOD!:yikes
NO QUAD ....... NO PARTING WITH THE WAD
Were quad mixes actually done of the 3rd and 4th albums?
However, this set could have been a winner if they would have included the Greatest Hits as a Multichannel SACD.
That's very unlikely since Chad Kassem at Analogue Productions/Acoustic Sounds is a collector and fan of specific albums which he selects for reissues.
And seemingly/unequivocally, Chad selects the BEST material for Vinyl reissue and 'begrudgingly' chooses the crumbs for SACD reissue........and the same mindset applies to MoFi, as well.
That's very unlikely since Chad Kassem at Analogue Productions/Acoustic Sounds is a collector and fan of specific albums which he selects for reissues.
And seemingly, Chad selects the BEST material for Vinyl reissue and 'begrudgingly' chooses the crumbs for SACD reissue........and the same mindset applies to MoFi, as well.
In a number of cases, albums that are available for reissue on Vinyl LP are not made available for SACD reissue by the record label and artist.
That's a key factor as well.
In a number of cases, albums that are available for reissue on Vinyl LP are not made available for SACD reissue by the record label and artist.
That's a key factor as well.
Which really doesn't make sense at all since Vinyl is not an archival medium (every time you play a record 'it dies a little') but the artists perception that Analogue IS In and Digital is OUT always perplexes me.
Methinks, if the powers that be put as much effort into making Digital sound infinitely better than analogue to satisfy the purists, we wouldn't be having this discussion but at this juncture it's a moot point.
I know we have DSD256 but in theory it only applies to downloads (NO SACD machine is capable of physically playing it via disc) but let's be real....PCM is still the preferred format for Motion Pictures, TV and the recording industry at large and in some cases, some artists still prefer to record in analogue so until this crazy industry gets its act together and consistently decides on a single format this 'schizophrenia' which pervades the industry will always be ultimately frustrating.
That's very unlikely since Chad Kassem at Analogue Productions/Acoustic Sounds is a collector and fan of specific albums which he selects for reissues.
While Marshall Blonstein at Audio Fidelity is a former major label exec (Columbia Records, Island Records' President and co-founder of Ode Records) who loves Best Of and Collection albums - which Audio Fidelity reissues.
Please, never make a reasoned argument for this on the hoffman board...they will burn you as a heretic.
Isn't this set likely to be a poor seller for AP simply because the best two albums included have not only previously been released on SACD - but they are both currently still in stock at many online retailers?
And in the case of the S/T second album, this is the forth release on SACD (DSD), of an album that also got a previous a MFSL gold disc issue.
It is interesting that Marshall at AF has so strongly avoided titles which have already had DSD reissues (with the exception of BS&T), but other companies (like AP) have less fear of that factor having a negative impact on sales, or so it seems. Maybe AP are about to see what a stiff looks like.
Which really doesn't make sense at all since Vinyl is not an archival medium (every time you play a record 'it dies a little') but the artists perception that Analogue IS In and Digital is OUT always perplexes me.
The reissue labels are at the mercy of the major record labels and artists that control the albums - in terms of which ones are available for reissue and in what format.
I don't see why AP should have much trouble selling SACDs of these albums. Seems like just the type of classic rock that stereo audiophiles love to buy again and again. Business as usual.
Isn't this set likely to be a poor seller for AP simply because the best two albums included have not only previously been released on SACD - but they are both currently still in stock at many online retailers?
And in the case of the S/T second album, this is the forth release on SACD (DSD), of an album that also got a previous a MFSL gold disc issue.
It is interesting that Marshall at AF has so strongly avoided titles which have already had DSD reissues (with the exception of BS&T), but other companies (like AP) have less fear of that factor having a negative impact on sales, or so it seems. Maybe AP are about to see what a stiff looks like.
It'll be a poor seller because they included the surround mixes. Surround doesn't sell. Always blame the surround layer for poor sales. Best. Scapegoat. Ever.
Enter your email address to join: