Thanks Thanks:  8
Likes Likes:  8
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

  1. #1
    Member windhoek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Somewhere in your mind as a memory...
    Posts
    58
    Points
    3,037
    Level
    33
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 13
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    Here's an interesting oddity. Someone has downmixed the Talking Heads 5.1 releases to stereo and although it seems like a bizarre thing to do and perhaps odd to talk about it here at QQ, the downmixes seem to offer something new. Robin Sharoma, the guy who made the new mixes, reckons the 5.1 mixes are more dynamic for a start, so pulling that back to a stereo mix, should result in a stereo mix with better dynamic range. He also reckons there are other upsides about doing this including iirc, that the 5.1 mixes were created using the original multitrack tapes. The upshot of which is, the downmixes are almost certainly going to sound different to most other stereo releases, if not all - whether that includes vinyl, I don't know.

    I downloaded all the albums last night and the dynamic range is very good and the music does indeed sound different to the stereo versions that come as part of the CD/DVD-A releases. Do I like them? In a word, yes!

    I'd be happy to share the download link with anyone, but in any case, you'll probably want to click here at Robin's website where he talks about the project before doing anything else. Fwiw, the downmixes aren't directly available to download from his website.
    Speak words as sweet as honey, for one day you may have to eat them!

  2. Thanks Snood thanked for this post
    Likes Snood liked this post
  3. #2
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,133
    Points
    5,706
    Level
    48
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 44
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    So wouldn't it skip a stage or two to just set the player to downmix, then pro logic it at the amp?

  4. #3
    Member windhoek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Somewhere in your mind as a memory...
    Posts
    58
    Points
    3,037
    Level
    33
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 13
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    That's a good question. I can only speculate that if that was the case, Robin wouldn't have went to all that trouble to create downmixed files.

    I'm at work, but when I finish tomorrow, I'll see if I can try that out. I imagine I should be able to output 5.1 from my OPPO and force a downmix to stereo with my AVR. I'll update the thread with the results...
    Speak words as sweet as honey, for one day you may have to eat them!

  5. Thanks Mike the Fish thanked for this post
  6. #4
    300 Club - QQ All Star Ninecats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    305
    Points
    3,038
    Level
    33
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 12
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    I have no insight in downmixing, but as I've stated in a poll for one of these releases, yes the stereo versions of the CD/DVD package are not very good. The original vinyls have much better sound. Way more dynamic in the multichannel option, however, they all sound very good!

  7. #5
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,133
    Points
    5,706
    Level
    48
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 44
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    Quote Originally Posted by windhoek View Post
    That's a good question. I can only speculate that if that was the case, Robin wouldn't have went to all that trouble to create downmixed files.

    I'm at work, but when I finish tomorrow, I'll see if I can try that out. I imagine I should be able to output 5.1 from my OPPO and force a downmix to stereo with my AVR. I'll update the thread with the results...
    That sounds a bit more complex for the amp - two processes. I've got some Talking Heads in 5.1 so I could give it a go here. FWIW, and you probably know this, an AV amp via HDMI can be forced into downmixing if connected by HDMI to a stereo TV and set to dual (rather than seperate). I guess I could try both downmixing at the player stage and at the amp stage and see if either works better than the other.

  8. Likes windhoek liked this post
  9. #6
    Member windhoek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Somewhere in your mind as a memory...
    Posts
    58
    Points
    3,037
    Level
    33
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 13
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike the Fish View Post
    That sounds a bit more complex for the amp - two processes. I've got some Talking Heads in 5.1 so I could give it a go here. FWIW, and you probably know this, an AV amp via HDMI can be forced into downmixing if connected by HDMI to a stereo TV and set to dual (rather than seperate). I guess I could try both downmixing at the player stage and at the amp stage and see if either works better than the other.
    That's a very good idea Mike. I'll probably start off with the LOVE DVD-A by The Beatles because that's a multichannel-only disc and if I can get that downmixed to stereo via HDMI to my AVR (whether using my TV to help out), then hopefully the same results can be achieved with a 5.1 source via HDMI to my AVR.

    On the fly downmixing might be simpler, but I'm not sure why Robin wanted 5.1 downmixes in the first place. Perhaps he didn't have a multichannel setup at the time or simply wanted better stereo sources to play in stereo-only setups. Who knows. But I look forward to experimenting tomorrow and hearing about what you discover too - or not as the case may be
    Speak words as sweet as honey, for one day you may have to eat them!

  10. Likes Mike the Fish liked this post
  11. #7
    Moderator zeerround's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    110
    Points
    5,321
    Level
    46
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 29
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    When downmixing one has to decide how much C to but in L and R, how much LFE (if any) and how much LS and RS. Sadly, there doesn't seem to be a standard, with different hardware doing different things, and some formats allowing the producer to decide ahead of time.

    So, your downmix in hardware might come out different than "downmixed by someone".

    I would argue that downmix should match what would happen at the listening position in an ITU 5.1 setup (in terms of levels of the different channels), however most downmix implementations are going to drop the rears by some amount.

    Also, I didn't understand the reference to pro-logic. What is that for? If you have multi-channel listen to the 5.1 in multi-channel.

  12. Thanks JanBakker, Mike the Fish, Robert van Diggele thanked for this post
    Likes JanBakker, Robert van Diggele liked this post
  13. #8
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,133
    Points
    5,706
    Level
    48
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 44
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    Quote Originally Posted by zeerround View Post
    If you have multi-channel listen to the 5.1 in multi-channel.
    Yeah, that's a strange one, but it appears to be suggested that the decoding is different. That's non-commital comment at its finest.

  14. Likes JanBakker liked this post
  15. #9
    Member windhoek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Somewhere in your mind as a memory...
    Posts
    58
    Points
    3,037
    Level
    33
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 13
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    I spent the last 30 minutes or so experimenting with on the fly downmixing and I think it's safe to conclude, downmixed music sounds different to the stereo equivalent: sometimes for the better, sometimes not.

    I achieved this by adjusting my AVR's speaker setup to front Left and Right only to ensure all multichannel audio was downmixed and used my HTPC to switch between various stereo and m/c tracks of the same album. With regard to Talking Heads, The downmixed intro to The Overload sounded better and more dynamic than the stereo version, but the glissando bass intro to Road To Nowhere doesn't appear in the downmixed version (whether played in 5.1 or downmixed) and I think the song is better with the bass slide, as found on the stereo version. So in that instance, I think the stereo version is better. I did the same with other songs and with other artists and again, the results varied.

    So the results achieved by Robin Sharrock can be replicated simply by tweaking the settings of our hardware to force downmix to stereo on the fly. I suppose if one wanted a downmixed file to play in a stereo only system, such as through headphones with a portable MP3 player, then creating new files could be useful. And there is undoubtably some merit in downmixing if it sounds better than the stereo equivalent as well as the multuchannel mix. Considering there are some duff multuchannel mixes out there, it might even be the best option! An opportunity for further experimentation
    Speak words as sweet as honey, for one day you may have to eat them!

  16. Thanks Mike the Fish thanked for this post
  17. #10
    1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,133
    Points
    5,706
    Level
    48
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 44
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    Quote Originally Posted by windhoek View Post
    ...the glissando bass intro to Road To Nowhere... and I think the song is better with the bass slide, as found on the stereo version.
    Yeah, that sticks out like a sore thumb. I don't think it works better for being cut.

  18. Likes windhoek liked this post
  19. #11
    Member windhoek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Somewhere in your mind as a memory...
    Posts
    58
    Points
    3,037
    Level
    33
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 13
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike the Fish View Post
    Yeah, that sticks out like a sore thumb. I don't think it works better for being cut.
    Yeah, it's like having a Grand Canyon where a mountain should be!
    Speak words as sweet as honey, for one day you may have to eat them!

  20. Likes Mike the Fish liked this post
  21. #12
    500 Club - QQ All Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    513
    Points
    12,212
    Level
    72
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 238
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Blog entry10000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    Quote Originally Posted by windhoek View Post
    That's a very good idea Mike. I'll probably start off with the LOVE DVD-A by The Beatles because that's a multichannel-only disc and if I can get that downmixed to stereo via HDMI to my AVR (whether using my TV to help out), then hopefully the same results can be achieved with a 5.1 source via HDMI to my AVR.

    On the fly downmixing might be simpler, but I'm not sure why Robin wanted 5.1 downmixes in the first place. Perhaps he didn't have a multichannel setup at the time or simply wanted better stereo sources to play in stereo-only setups. Who knows. But I look forward to experimenting tomorrow and hearing about what you discover too - or not as the case may be
    An interesting disc you bring-up from a downmix standpoint. The downmix coefficients for the Love DVD-A are not correct. They result in too much level going to the front left/right channels if you play the disc on a stereo system that implements the downmix correctly.

    I know this because my wife had a Lexus with a "funky" Mark Levinson system. This was before true 5.1-channel was implemented but after DVD-Audio was added to the Levinsons. What that system did was to take whatever source was used, convert it to stereo and then create a synthesized surround output. So, it actually downmixed 5.1-channel to stereo, using the coefficients when possible, and then recreated the "surround experience" from the downmixed stereo input.

    Any time I'd try to play the Love DVD-Audio disc in that car (which we no longer have) any loud peaks would distort. Only disc that did that. I was able to check with someone at the company who confirmed that was the likely source and it's the only reason that made sense.

    So, if your downmix of the Love DVD-Audio disc isn't quite "right" then it's not your system that has a problem. I'm sure there are probably some systems that add extra headroom but that wouldn't be accurate.

    Bottom line if you don't account for the possibility that adding front left and rear left will result in twice the maximum level the system can handle, then you might get digital distortion when you play the combined channels back.

    Andy

  22. #13
    Moderator zeerround's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    110
    Points
    5,321
    Level
    46
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 29
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    That's why I posted about the difference between letting your hardware do it and somebody doing it in software.

    I haven't seen any mix down coefficients that are technically correct for music (all channels should result in the same volume at your ear, as they would have in the 5.1 case). -3dB rears, "dialog normalization" on the center, no LFE, etc. etc.

    Then there's the problem you highlighted, Lazy producer not checking for mixdown clipping when setting the coefficients (probably just took the default).

  23. Thanks JanBakker thanked for this post
  24. #14
    Moderator zeerround's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    110
    Points
    5,321
    Level
    46
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 29
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Talking Heads 5.1 Downmixes

    Here are my 5.1 to 2.0 mixdown coefficients.:
    L R
    LF 31.6% 0%
    RF 0% 31.6%
    C 15.9% 15.9%
    LFE 15.9% 15.9%
    LS 31.6% 0%
    RS 0% 31.6%

    31.6% = -10dB
    15.9% = -16dB

    That allows for a 0dB signal in all six channels without clipping, so you'll probably want to normalize after downmixing, as that is unlikely to happen so you're overall volume would be low without normalization (but guaranteed no clipping). Sony SoundForge is one good tool for these processes.

  25. Thanks HomerJAU thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •