A Love Supreme - brief comparison of all 4 CDs

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
K

kstuart

Guest
Hello,

I recently picked up a used Sony DVP-NC650V (a good price since the LCD is partially bad), which does 5 disks of DVD, SACD, or CD (and my Toshiba DVD/DVD-Audio player has mediocre CD playback, so CD was a factor).

I'm a fan of John Coltrane's <strong>A Love Supreme</strong>, so one of the first disks I bought was the SACD version. I also have all the previous CD versions, so I used the disk changer feature to compare all 4 disks on the first 2 minutes of the album.

None are particularly great in terms of audiophile sound quality, and the piano is too low in all versions (all use 2 track tapes, so no remixes and I'm not sure they used multitrack for the sessions (12/64)).

However, none of the four is particuarly bad, either and any would serve for listening to this great classic.

I auditioned them several times in order from oldest CD to the most recent (SACD). Like all original CDs, the original MCA CD had concise and small sounds that allow the listener to "place" the instrument in the image more easily. Since the trailing reverb dies off very quickly, then the initial percussive sound of the instrument is emphasized, such as the tap of the drumsticks hitting the cymbal.

The next CD, the "20 bit remaster", increases all the detail of the instruments, with the result that the initial percussive sound almost disappears. In the cymbals, there is almost no tap and a wealth of shimmering high end energy. This CD is typical of my least favorite style of remaster - maximum detail and minimum dynamics. Still, this is not so bad with jazz.

The most recent CD version is the original engineer's remaster (Rudy Van Gelder). The liner notes reveal that the original two track remaster is lost, and all the previous CDs used an equalized copy. So, he searched off-shore sites and found a better copy without the pre-equalization. This CD has some advantages over the previous remaster, but is still missing some percussiveness and drive.

Rudy Van Gelder also did the SACD version (possibly in the same sessions, since the previous CD version was quite recent). And the result is very good. The SACD has the most detail yet, and is the first digital version to have both the instrument detail and that initial percussive sounds. The soundstaging is good, and it generally has that more smooth high-res sound. This is definitely the preferred version of this album.

So, this SACD is a good example of how non-hybrid stereo-only SACDs can still be worthwhile. I paid $12.99 at Circuit City and they have had it as low as $11.25 on sale.
 
Thanks for the info. Two comments

1) Rudy Van Gelder used 2-track well into the 60's with a good mono sound being his primary objective. If you've heard any on the Blue Note albums he's re-mastered, you'll notice they sound almost mono compaired to the earlier CD versions. I don't know how he handled the re-mastering for ALS, but just thought I'd mention that with regards to your comment about the use of multi-track tape for the session.

2) I just can't justify buying this album again. I've considered getting the deluxe 2 cd set to get a better quality version of the live ALS I have on a bootleg, but I don't listen to that enough to justify the $30. It's interesting how jazz is a pretty low seller for the majors, yet the classics get issued and re-issued again and again. There's been at least 6 different versions of this album on cd (add another if you include the one in the box set) since the first came out in, what 1988 or so? I just know if I plunk down for another upgrade, they'll be a new one in a year or two. It's almost as bad as PC graphic cards. :rollin:
 
Back
Top