• QuadraphonicQuad welcomes you and encourages your participation! Treat all members with respect. Please keep all discussions civil, even when you have a strong opinion on a particular topic.

    Do not offer for free, offer for sale, offer for trade, or request copies or files of copyrighted material - no matter how rare or unavailable to the public they might be. We do not condone the illegal sharing of music. There are many places on the internet where you can participate in such transactions, but QuadraphonicQuad is not one of them. We are here to encourage and support new multichannel releases from those companies that still provide them and as such the distribution of illegal copies of recordings is counter-productive to that effort. Any posts of this sort will be deleted without notification.

    Please try to avoid discussions that pit one format against another. Hint for new users: make liberal use of the search facilities here at QuadraphonicQuad. Our message base is an incredibly rich resource of detailed information on virtually all topics pertaining to surround-sound. You will be surprised at what you can find with a little digging!

HiRez Poll Deep Purple - MACHINE HEAD [DVD-A]/[SACD-JAPAN]

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

Rate the DVD-A of Deep Purple - MACHINE HEAD


  • Total voters
    92

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
23,237
Location
London, England
I am considering updating my collection with some of the new Japanese SACD releases....does anyone know if there's any difference between the new Fleetwood Mac SACD and the original DVD-A? Are the mixes the same or different? I love the DVD-A mix and don't want to part with it if the Japanese SACD is different...thanks!
I'd only do it if for investment purposes as the Japanese SACDs will appreciate in value quite significantly I reckon.

Or if you prefer instant access to playback rather than all the potential of having to switch the TV on & added menu navigating/remote-fiddling of (some) DVDA's.

Oh and they're the same mixes. I can't see how the SACD's would sound any better than the original DVDA's.. in fact some might argue they'll sound worse (potential for strange stuff to creep in when going from PCM source to DSD etc.. and all the arguments about the high-res PCM of DVDA sounding closer to the master tapes than noise-shaped DSD/SACD.

If I were in your shoes I'd save your money.. Oh and keep your Peter Gabriel's etc..! hehe.. :)
 

leevitalone1

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
3,988
Location
The navel of NY state
real classic! I bought the LP the same day it was released, after work on payday in the record store and they had Lazy playing, so I'm looking for something new and bingo! me and My friends went nuts that night listening to it. Really glad it got on HR
I gave it a 9
 

Quad Linda

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
8,213
Location
DROP YOUR WAD ON QUAD Chicago, Illinois
A/B'ing the DVD-A to the DVD-V Quad (SQ) mix in DTS. Advanced res is sooo much more open and immediate. Still, I prefer the original mix. The compression on the DVD-V gives it a more solid feel, which I kind of like. Don't squawk about DTS's compression, or lack thereof, this sounds much more compressed than the DVD-A. Perhaps that's because the DVD-A is a 2000 mix, going back to the master tapes. The DVD-V goes back to the 1972 Quad mix. The dynamic range and clarity of advanced res is most alluring. I also like the warm midrange and enhanced high end of the SQ LP through my moving coil cartridge. Although I haven't heard the EMI SACD, it is very probable that it combines many of the things I like about the various versions. Then again, the EMI SACD may sound just as compressed as the DTS. I have yet to play the SQ CD.

9. I got this when the DVD-A first hit and have it in a std jewel box. Mix is good, although I do prefer the SQ UK LP, which I also bought when it hit. Musically, it's a classic.
 

Simon A

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Jun 13, 2015
Messages
2,355
Don't know what all the hubbub is about this disc. I'd love to hear the quad sometime, but the Japanese SACD is awesome.
It's not that there's anything wrong about this disc or the mix. It's just that once I've heard the Quad, I just felt that the mix felt "right" and more organic compared to the 5.1. It may just be a matter of taste. The Quad is fully immersive and lively.
 

edisonbaggins

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
7,475
Location
Wherever I May Roam
It's not that there's anything wrong about this disc or the mix. It's just that once I've heard the Quad, I just felt that the mix felt "right" and more organic compared to the 5.1. It may just be a matter of taste. The Quad is fully immersive and lively.
Totally understandable. Yet, the 5.1 mix is pretty discrete and immersive, with great sonics. If the quad is better it must be very good indeed!
 

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
23,237
Location
London, England
Totally understandable. Yet, the 5.1 mix is pretty discrete and immersive, with great sonics. If the quad is better it must be very good indeed!
Please check your PMs in 8 minutes... :eek:

Ps. See what you think but one of my main bugbears with the SQ Quad mix is the drums sound like crisp packets being scrunched for the most part, drums are totally given a shot in the arm with the newer 5.1 remix (though I'm a drum nut freakazoid so the drum sound is v.important to me, it might not be such a big deal to others :upthumb )
 

ssully

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
2,686
Location
in your face
It's not that there's anything wrong about this disc or the mix. It's just that once I've heard the Quad, I just felt that the mix felt "right" and more organic compared to the 5.1. It may just be a matter of taste. The Quad is fully immersive and lively.
There's two different quad mixes: UK and US.

So AFAIK overall there's three surround mixes:
1970s US quad (later released on SACD)
1970s UK quad
2001 DVD-A 5.1 (re-released on SACD)

IIRC difference between US and UK quad is quite notable during the guitar solo of 'Lazy'. Different edits.
 

timbre4

Super Moderator
Staff member
QQ Supporter
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
6,908
Location
College Grove, TN
Would've thought somebody would comment that the SACD (EMI 07243 5386012) includes the "1972" great quad mix and not the complete DVD-A 5.1 mix of the album itself. I believe this to be the same as the UK quad mix but would have to compare it to the US version. It also includes 3 additional tracks - Maybe I'm a Leo (alternate mix), Lazy (alternate mix), When a Blind Man (definitely 5.1 from DVD-A version)
 

kap'n krunch

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
6,392
Location
estados hundidos
Would've thought somebody would comment that the SACD (EMI 07243 5386012) includes the "1972" great quad mix and not the complete DVD-A 5.1 mix of the album itself. I believe this to be the same as the UK quad mix but would have to compare it to the US version. It also includes 3 additional tracks - Maybe I'm a Leo (alternate mix), Lazy (alternate mix), When a Blind Man (definitely 5.1 from DVD-A version)
AFAIK the "Great" Quad mix (the one released in the UK in SQ LP) was never released on DVD-A, only on SACD.

The 5.1 "modern" mix was released on DVD-A..
 

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
23,237
Location
London, England
Wasn't the quad mix also available in the 40th anniversary box set on DVD DTS as well ?
Yes! :upthumb
(I should clarify, the UK Quad as found on the EMI Hybrid SACD is also in DTS and Dolby Digital DVD-V in the 40th Anniversary box set :eek: )
 

JanBakker

1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
QQ Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
1,763
Location
Coevorden, The Netherlands
This is a MCh Flac sample from the 40th Anniv. DVD-V...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/gi7n7aythks0wpd/05 - Smoke On The Water UK QUAD.flac?dl=0

(See if you like the crisp packet drums? :eek: )
Everything else about it I love love LOVE... however, the drums, baby.. those drums...
Do you like the drums on the 5.1 SACD more? I ask this because I have that one and I think the drumsound is good on that one although I have the feeling that most members here prefer the quad mixes.
 

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
23,237
Location
London, England
Do you like the drums on the 5.1 SACD more? I ask this because I have that one and I think the drumsound is good on that one although I have the feeling that most members here prefer the quad mixes.
Yes I do prefer the drum sound on the 5.1 SACD, various other aspects I prefer of the Quad by comparison.. its a bit like the Layla situation = if I could take aspects of Climie's mixes and combine them with aspects of Scheiners' mixes that for me would be the perfect Layla in surround, as it is, well, I enjoy bits of both sets of remixes and am thankful such a classic album received not one but two surround remixes! :)
 

Philip Spinner

1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
1,280
Location
Southwest Connecticut
If Audio Fidelity ever managed to release the U.S. quad mix that was only available on cd-4, Q8 and Q4 this whole debate on which has a better surround mix would finally be put to rest. The U.S. quad mix blows away all of the others, absolutely. Just my humble opinion though.
 

kap'n krunch

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Nov 25, 2008
Messages
6,392
Location
estados hundidos
If Audio Fidelity ever managed to release the U.S. quad mix that was only available on cd-4, Q8 and Q4 this whole debate on which has a better surround mix would finally be put to rest. The U.S. quad mix blows away all of the others, absolutely. Just my humble opinion though.
UK SQ LP mix fan here though!!!!

:slap::smack:

well, to each their own....





OK , no, no way is the CD-4 version better in a million years!!!!(OK, well, it's not that bad..I just prefer the UK one...)
 
2
Top