• QuadraphonicQuad welcomes you and encourages your participation! Treat all members with respect. Please keep all discussions civil, even when you have a strong opinion on a particular topic.

    Do not offer for free, offer for sale, offer for trade, or request copies or files of copyrighted material - no matter how rare or unavailable to the public they might be. We do not condone the illegal sharing of music. There are many places on the internet where you can participate in such transactions, but QuadraphonicQuad is not one of them. We are here to encourage and support new multichannel releases from those companies that still provide them and as such the distribution of illegal copies of recordings is counter-productive to that effort. Any posts of this sort will be deleted without notification.

    Please try to avoid discussions that pit one format against another. Hint for new users: make liberal use of the search facilities here at QuadraphonicQuad. Our message base is an incredibly rich resource of detailed information on virtually all topics pertaining to surround-sound. You will be surprised at what you can find with a little digging!

John from Rhino.com here - THANK YOU, QUADRAPHONIC QUAD FORUM!

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

EMB

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
4,104
Location
The Top 40 Radio of My Mind
The truth is that quad or 5.1 audio has always been boutique, audiophile stuff, and a label has to be committed and its expectations modest to stay in business while keeping itself solvent. Some reissue labels, like Ace, Sundazed, Eric and a few others remain, but they're oldies cats, they're not interested in quad. And the companies that control most of the quad tapes are too big to care, they're more concerned about selling a zillion downloads of some song by the latest bleating guy or gal. I understand that, that's where the money is, but major labels' catalog intentions these days are Walmart/Target oriented: compilations of the usual material by the usual legends. The truly interesting reissues are from the smaller labels because no one else cares, and those labels are content with their limited customers, because like them, they're collectors and archivists, too. But a gal like Taylor Swift probably sells more copies of an album in one year than all the reissue labels and their titles combined; small wonder oldies reissues--let alone quad--are niche items. But that's the reality, just a pity we can't get someone at a major label to do a Hip-O type thing but do it in a quad way. I mean, if you've got Steely Dan 5.1 remixes in the can, why not put them out through your boutique label?

ED :)
 
Top