
Jon Anderson, Soothsayer of Wonderous Stories
Forgive the imagery, but Jon Anderson is like the Energizer bunny of progressive music—he just keeps on going and going.
@haikubass beat you to it--but it's good to spread the info around, since not everyone sees every thread...![]()
Jon Anderson, Soothsayer of Wonderous Stories
Forgive the imagery, but Jon Anderson is like the Energizer bunny of progressive music—he just keeps on going and going.www.soundandvision.com
Dang. So this is issue #112, from August, I take it?Good news and bad news on this. I'm just reading the latest Prog magazine which has a nice long piece with Jon Anderson, and it mentions the Olias reissue.
- its set for release at the end of January 2021
- 2 disc set cd and dvd
- high res stereo included
- on Esoteric label, overseen by Mark Powell
- they couldn't find the multitracks, so the surround is an upmix
- the upmix has been done by Ben Wiseman (?) and Mark Powell says its a really good upmix from the stereo masters
No, issue 115, December, arrived in today's post.Dang. So this is issue #112, from August, I take it?
Got it. (I couldn't find it at first, and there was a long interview with Anderson in Issue 112.) Nice cover!No, issue 115, December, arrived in today's post.
Oh I hope not! Labels just need to learn to leave an album alone if the tapes are fully missing.I wonder if this will lead to future esoteric releases of 5.1 upmixes Going For The One, Tormato and Drama.![]()
I should know this, but: do we know that the tapes are missing or incomplete for those 3 (GFTO, Tormato, Drama)--or is it just that Wilson wasn't previously interested in doing them?Oh I hope not! Labels just need to learn to leave an album alone if the tapes are fully missing.
The 5 albums SW remixed were the only ones the label and band could find.I should know this, but: do we know that the tapes are missing or incomplete for those 3 (GFTO, Tormato, Drama)--or is it just that Wilson wasn't previously interested in doing them?
My only guess Jeff is that once the stereo masters were struck and with the previous history of early QUAD 'attempts' going BUST, they felt no need to preserve the multi tracks.How do multitracks get lost?
I understand that with a private pressing or small label that goes out of business no one pays the bills for storage bankruptcy follows and stuff is thrown into the trash to be gone forever.
In the old days before CDs and reissues once a stereo master was made were the multis regarded as no longer necessary and discarded?
Is this a problem primarily for pop and rock or did classical music have this issue also .It seems some jazz labels kept their outtakes for posterity. I realize outtakes may not be the same thing as multi tracks.
I just dont understand how a major label with good sales can lose these unless it was a policy to discard or reuse tape to save money...
Good 'Leonardo' analogy Jeff. But it seems the biggest problem with these record 'types' is the COST of STORING the literally hundreds of thousands of multi tracks associated with most rock recordings. They felt it was an unnecessary expense and disposing of them was the ultimate solution.Pretty sad.
The only thing I can think of akin to this are early drawings and studies for paintings.
Nobody would dream of throwing out Leonardo Da Vinci drawings and studies for completed projects as no longer being necessary.
But then some of the recent music company executives probably would....