surround.sound.enthusiast
500 Club - QQ All-Star
So we all know that none of the London Phase 4 Stereo LP's were quad. They just make our hearts rise, and then sink again, when we hit a record while record picking
with a big "4" splashed across the cover, only to say "Dammit, another Phase 4 Stereo!"
Well, how's this for mixing up the situation even worse, essentially Phase 4 Mono(!) :
First one of these that I think I've come across, or at least realized. The mix-down description is interesting. For 1962: mono - okay, that's natural. But in hindsight it seems
as funny as saying "Look at what we did, we took a four channel master recording, didn't release it as quad, and even bypassed releasing it as stereo. We made it mono!"
Ah, it was an amusing find...
with a big "4" splashed across the cover, only to say "Dammit, another Phase 4 Stereo!"
Well, how's this for mixing up the situation even worse, essentially Phase 4 Mono(!) :
First one of these that I think I've come across, or at least realized. The mix-down description is interesting. For 1962: mono - okay, that's natural. But in hindsight it seems
as funny as saying "Look at what we did, we took a four channel master recording, didn't release it as quad, and even bypassed releasing it as stereo. We made it mono!"
Ah, it was an amusing find...