So, not sure if it helps but this is my selection:Someone uploaded TItle 1 (51:57) as "2009 5.1 mix", but my Title 1 is the QUAD mix (DTS).
Last edited by a moderator:
Mike Oldfield "Tubular Bells" (limited-run SDE Blu-Ray with Dolby Atmos, 5.1, and Quad mixes shipping 5/26)
- Thread starter rtbluray
- Start date
Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:
I used MakeMKV in 'back-up' mode (to back-up the disc) followed by TSmuxerGUI to merge the part ones and twos together: -
As you can see, TSmuxerGUI is reporting different durations to @konoyaro's. However, these durations will be different again after the video streams are removed
Cheers
As you can see, TSmuxerGUI is reporting different durations to @konoyaro's. However, these durations will be different again after the video streams are removed
Cheers
Last edited by a moderator:
Apparently my copy left Langley on Saturday
Oooo-kay!I think you mean:
Shogoh wrach douch gwenoguah!
Flumoh guach dough wenooooh!
Shlogo guach dough gwenoguah!
Flogoh wach dogh wenoooh!
Mike Oldfield - Tubular.net Forums :: Tubular Bells 2009 Caveman "lyrics"
Forums dedicated to Mike Oldfield: discussion, news, reviews, fan music, and more. By Tubular.net.tubular.net
JulesRules
300 Club - QQ All-Star
Boot-leg! Boot-leg!
Charly Mann
Member
Mine arrived today in pristine condition at my home in NE Oklahoma. The ATMOS rendition is fantastic.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
- Messages
- 600
OM-F-G 11!!!
Nuttin' wrong with the ending, are you kidding? Sounding perfecto in the CINERAMAX newly gone coaxial Atmos lab.
Nuttin' wrong with the ending, are you kidding? Sounding perfecto in the CINERAMAX newly gone coaxial Atmos lab.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
- Messages
- 600
By the way if you like getting approached in a personally space invading way by the sound objects nothing beats coaxial for coherency and controlled directivity what best manifests in these jumping at you effects.
Question regarding the Quad mix: If I own the 2001 SACD with the quad mix, do I need to re-rip the quad from this SDE Blu-ray?
I understand the two might be different in mastering, but I would happily avoid duplicates if I don't have to re-rip it... and I'll just grab the Atmos mix and the 2009 5.1 mix.
I understand the two might be different in mastering, but I would happily avoid duplicates if I don't have to re-rip it... and I'll just grab the Atmos mix and the 2009 5.1 mix.
Scott65
1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
Mine arrived today. Now to play it several times....
Scott65
1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
As much as I love the quad mix (I have the SACD) I must admit I am really liking the Atmos mix. I do miss Vivian Stanshall vocals on the Sailor's Hornpipe though (buggered if I know why.....).
What determines whether or not a quad mix is "real"?
What is the basis of the classification of the US CD4/Q8 mix of Tubular bells as "upmix"? It's another one of those facts that I'm sure I've read somewhere multiple times. The SACD makes reference to "abortive attempts at an earlier four channel remix" - but abortive implies unfinished. It's not clear what exactly that's referring to. I do recall reading something elsewhere about the original mix that used language about it being "fake" or "upmix" though. But I don't remember what exactly I read where or when.
But we've often found that artist recollections of things don't align exactly. Having the CD4 and Q8, they aren't anything I'd classify as upmix or fake. Perhaps there were technical complications that resulted in a compromised product that left people with negative views/memories of the mix. Perhaps with these limitations, they had to "fake" a few things - which then turns into them dismissing it as "oh, we faked that". But from hearing this mix, this isn't like the A&M fake mixes of Herb Alpert or Sergio Mendes.
In the liner notes of one of the versions I have, MO calls the original Quad mix a weird attempt using phase tricks, that the studio wasn't sophisticated enough to do more.
That's just a paraphrase from my dodgy memory.
From what I've seen in this forum, you're the only one with an actual Atmos setup.OM-F-G 11!!!
Nuttin' wrong with the ending, are you kidding? Sounding perfecto in the CINERAMAX newly gone coaxial Atmos lab.
I think a lot of folks posting here have Atmos setups, no?
Any reason to rip the Quad mix from the blu-ray if I already own the 2001 SACD? Any differences? I would be happy to save time and disc space if the two are identical or similar.
Well, the question is if the 2001 release has this error that's on the Blu Ray release or not, because it's pretty important: HiRez Poll - Oldfield, Mike - TUBULAR BELLS [Blu-Ray Audio (Dolby Atmos)]
Thanks. I don't think the 2001 SACD has this error (see screenshot below). The two front channels of the SACD are on top, the Blu-ray at the bottom.
Also, on the Blu-ray, the EQ is slightly different.
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmmm... How can we know with 100% certainty which version is in error?
Similar threads
- Poll
