2K Club - QQ Super Nova
- Jul 2, 2003
- in your face
All you need to know about this entire thing is that before someone told them there was a digital step, none of the people convinced that a digital step means "bad sound" could tell there was a digital step.
But, but...when they learned about it, suddenly *veils descended*.
It's very much like when one of the most famous hi rez (SACD, DVDA) versus standard rez (downconverted to 16/44) blind tests was published, reporting the predictable 'no difference' results, those results were challenged on the basis that quite a few of the SACDs and DVDAs used *were sourced from analog tape* -- they cannot reveal the true glory of hi rez!
Did the challengers not see what this meant, following the logic of their objection? It meant:
-- all the rave reviews of those DVDAs and SACDs that attributed the improved sound to hi rez -- as virtually all did -- were laughably misguided
-- all-digital really is better than digital with an analog step