Quantcast

Pink Floyd DSOTM & WYWH 5.1 Surround SACD Reissues

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

~dave~~wave~

800 Club - QQ All-Star
QQ Supporter
Joined
Jun 7, 2016
Messages
862
Location
Lincoln, NE USA

sbrom

500 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
573
Location
US
It bears repeating that the evil Walton empire has the Immersion box with both mixes on blu ray in stock.
Hell may freeze over before the AP versions ships.
I started this thread two years ago.
Tired of waiting, I took the plunge, for $74.
Delightful.

https://www.walmart.com/ip/Dark-Side-Of-The-Moon-Immersion-Edition-6-Disc-Set-3-CDs-2-DVDs-and-1-Blu-ray-Disc/17350810
Good choice. I have the immersion set and the SACD. At the Walmart Immersion price you get a LOT more value for your money over the SACD. As you said both mixes, and let’s not forget the black marbles...:)
 

ssully

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
2,911
Location
in your face
Doubtful. Too bad they also didn't includquote]e the original Alan Parson's 4.0 remix ... but that's NOT going to happen. I'm sure it will be an 'enhancement' over the Capitol SACD since AP wil be employing the latest technology but how much of an improvement remains to be seen [heard].
The only way to make it sound different is to change the EQ or channel levels. There is no 'latest technology' to do otherwise.
 

4-earredwonder

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
14,967
The only way to make it sound different is to change the EQ or channel levels. There is no 'latest technology' to do otherwise.
There is DSD 256 [QUAD] remastering from the original analogue masters. That's a relatively new and effective technology, ssully!
 
Last edited:

ssully

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
2,911
Location
in your face
There is DSD 256 [QUAD] remastering from the original analogue masters. That's a relatively new and effective technology, ssully!
Huh?

Brian says up there
"It's a repressing of the Surround SACD edition of Dark Side of the Moon that was previously released. "

So, not a QUAD remix (which would obviously be a difference, though it's hardly new technology) , nor is it another transfer of the original master tapes (which could result in EQ /noise level differences that could be audible).

But no, simply remastering something in DSD 256 , that in itself would not make an audible difference. And added EQ/level changes along the way, would.
 

bmoura

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2003
Messages
9,519
Location
Redwood City, CA
Brian says up there
"It's a repressing of the Surround SACD edition of Dark Side of the Moon that was previously released. "

So, not a QUAD remix (which would obviously be a difference, though it's hardly new technology) , nor is it another transfer of the original master tapes (which could result in EQ /noise level differences that could be audible).

But no, simply remastering something in DSD 256 , that in itself would not make an audible difference. And added EQ/level changes along the way, would.
A couple of things to comment on here:

1. The Surround SACD edition of Dark Side of the Moon from Analogue Productions will be a repressing of the previously released edition.
There are several reasons for this. Including requests for a chance to buy the original SACD edition from listeners who missed the Surround SACD the first time around.
And the need to get artist approval if a new edition with remastering was created. (Remember Chad Kassem's comments about getting major artist reissue approvals "there are years - then there are Hendrix Years and Pink Floyd years...." )

2. DSD 256 releases do make an audible difference for a couple of reasons.
One is that the DSD format has been around for 20+ years now and the modulators used to create and remaster recordings in DSD are much better today than they were 2 decades ago.
The second reason is that by releasing an album in a higher DSD bit rate results in several benefits including the use of gentler filters in the listener's DAC, better phase and time response.
This explains why there is more and more demand from listeners for higher DSD bit rate releases and remasters than the DSD 64fs bit rate found on SACDs.
 

ssully

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
2,911
Location
in your face
A couple of things to comment on here:

1. The Surround SACD edition of Dark Side of the Moon from Analogue Productions will be a repressing of the previously released edition.
There are several reasons for this. Including requests for a chance to buy the original SACD edition from listeners who missed the Surround SACD the first time around.
And the need to get artist approval if a new edition with remastering was created. (Remember Chad Kassem's comments about getting major artist reissue approvals "there are years - then there are Hendrix Years and Pink Floyd years...." )
Indeed.

2. DSD 256 releases do make an audible difference for a couple of reasons.
One is that the DSD format has been around for 20+ years now and the modulators used to create and remaster recordings in DSD are much better today than they were 2 decades ago.
The second reason is that by releasing an album in a higher DSD bit rate results in several benefits including the use of gentler filters in the listener's DAC, better phase and time response.
This explains why there is more and more demand from listeners for high DSD bit rate releases and remasters.

Neat! All that needed then is solid DBT evidence that DSD 256 'does makes an audible difference' (particularly when we are talking about analog sources). Alas, that has never been forthcoming. Given the claims made about the distinct improvements from using DSD, it should be , should always have been, easy to prove. Alas, it has very much not been, ever. Might I suggest that if you must have peace of mind about filters etc... good old PCM can do that, too? With far smaller file sizes?

The real reason why there is 'more and more demand' for such things, if that's true, is that, it's a form of faith in high numbers.
 

bmoura

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2003
Messages
9,519
Location
Redwood City, CA
Indeed.

Neat! All that needed then is solid DBT evidence that DSD 256 'does makes an audible difference' (particularly when we are talking about analog sources). Alas, that has never been forthcoming. Given the claims made about the distinct improvements from using DSD, it should be , should always have been, easy to prove. Alas, it has very much not been, ever. Might I suggest that if you must have peace of mind about filters etc... good old PCM can do that, too? With far smaller file sizes?

The real reason why there is 'more and more demand' for such things, if that's true, is that, it's a form of faith in high numbers.
Have a listen to some of the Analog to DSD 256 releases. Many listeners hear the difference and are requesting more.
Along with the original recording artists, producers, engineers and record labels.

It explains the ever increasing number of releases in this DSD bit rate.
 

ssully

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
2,911
Location
in your face
Have a listen to some of the Analog to DSD 256 releases. Many listeners hear the difference and are requesting more.
Along with the original recording artists, producers, engineers and record labels.
Well, again, and this is pretty much always the case with 'hi rez', how are you to know that the 'sound' is due to DSD 256 specifically, versus typical mastering choices that do affect sound e.g., choice of source tape, application of EQ..?

It explains the ever increasing number of releases in this DSD bit rate.
It's just one possible explanation. Many listeners have reported hearing differences between many things. But sometimes those things don't really sound different. And sometimes they do, but the cause of the difference isn't what the listener thinks it is.
 

BeoProf

Well-known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
136
Location
Warsaw PL
Ahhhhh as I suspected. No reason to pre-order then. But great for those looking for that do not have.
I am actually looking forward to getting this one.
First, I did not get the previous version. Since there is many counterfeited copies floating online I did not want to risk it and I never really encountered it in a b&m store to be able to make sure it is legit.
Second, it looks like it might get the same type and size of cover as Wish You Were Here, so they would fit together nicely on the shelf :)
 

sbrom

500 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Apr 23, 2016
Messages
573
Location
US
Yes indeed, Wish You Were Here by Pink Floyd is In Stock at Acoustic Sounds
Wow, that video on remixing WYWH and the missing piano part is amazing. It makes me feel good about the attention to detail throughout the process.
 

marpow

QQ Lifetime Supporter
QQ Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
4,023
Location
San Mateo CA
I might get it for the new packaging which matches the packaging of Wish You Where Here.
I own the previous SACD MCH, and always thought the artwork and jewel case packaging didn't do justice.
51My27HaCwL.jpg
 
Top