• QuadraphonicQuad welcomes you and encourages your participation! Treat all members with respect. Please keep all discussions civil, even when you have a strong opinion on a particular topic.

    Do not offer for free, offer for sale, offer for trade, or request copies or files of copyrighted material - no matter how rare or unavailable to the public they might be. We do not condone the illegal sharing of music. There are many places on the internet where you can participate in such transactions, but QuadraphonicQuad is not one of them. We are here to encourage and support new multichannel releases from those companies that still provide them and as such the distribution of illegal copies of recordings is counter-productive to that effort. Any posts of this sort will be deleted without notification.

    Please try to avoid discussions that pit one format against another. Hint for new users: make liberal use of the search facilities here at QuadraphonicQuad. Our message base is an incredibly rich resource of detailed information on virtually all topics pertaining to surround-sound. You will be surprised at what you can find with a little digging!

Quality Quadraphonic Turntable Recommendations

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

A

AudioLancelot

Guest
Hi

I apologize for another request.

What quality manufacturers, models, cartridge and stylus are recomended by the group with respect to quadraphonic turntables?

Thanks

Dennis
 

Obbop

500 Club - QQ All-Star
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
546
Location
Missouri
If you don't want a TT with a built in CD-4 demodulator your choices obviously increase.

I have a Technics SL-1300 I bought in 1975. It is rock solid and perform like new, even after being stored in a garage for 14 years. A dusty hot garage. All it had was a old blanket over the top of it.

It came standard with the proper imperdence cables. All I had to do was add a CD-4 capable cartridge. I chose the Pickering 5000 model.

If all yah' wanna' play are matrix-type records yah' don't even need a shibata-style cartridge.

For SQ, QS, etc LPs any turntable will work though quality improves the sound of any record. So does a quality cartridge.

I am not the CD-4 expert since I gave up on the format.
 

Cai Campbell

In Remembrance
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
2,970
Location
Seattle, WA
Yeah, that's the main question: Do you plan on using the turntable for CD-4 records, Matrix, or all of the above? The answer would greatly impact the type of recommendation I would make.

 

The Quadfather

Moderator
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
1,557
Location
Dixie
Check out the thread on CD-4 on this website. It has a sub thread titled "CD-4 equipment that works well". You can get good performance from CD-4, but it takes a little work to get it right. There you will find listings of cartridges and turntables that work well. Note that many fine turntables were built during the quad era that are CD-4 compatible, and they aren't hard to find. Look for thick signal wires, almost as thick as video cables. Garage sales and flea markets are good places to look. Since it was easy to modify the design of a turntable to make it CD-4 compatible, these turntables often found their way into stereo systems as well. A high quality table of the era generally was compatible. For matrix quad, the requirements are no greater than stereo, but for CD-4, low capacitance cabling is required, including in the tonearm itself.

The Quadfather
 
Top