HiRez Poll Steely Dan - GAUCHO [DVD-A/SACD]

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

Rate the DVD-A/SACD of Steely Dan - GAUCHO


  • Total voters
    211

JonUrban

Forum Curmudgeon
Staff member
Admin
Moderator
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
17,561
Location
Connecticut
Please post your comments, thoughts and observations.......(y) (n)

(Since this is a "HiRez" poll, it should not include how you feel about the DTS CD, however you can post your feelings comparing the DTS with the SACD/DVD-A)

SACD scans:
R-1190473-1199553042.jpeg.jpg

R-1190473-1199553414.jpeg.jpg


DVD-A/V scans:
R-1865436-1394638167-7792.jpeg.jpg

R-1865436-1394638171-1020.jpeg.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MIDIQ

600 Club - QQ All-Star
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Messages
651
Location
US
I have this one on DTS CD, and it is just fantastic. I gave it a 10, great songs and great surround mix, a must have for me. I can't see any reason to upgrade to the DVD-A or SACD, this one sounds superb to me in DTS CD. :)
 

bobou2

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
297
Location
The Bronx
Well I have all 3 surround versions of this great album.
My SACD developed cracks within 3 weeks of purchase so I had to buy the DVD-A when that came out, but I had the 563a so no play until upgrade.
IMHO the DVD-a has a better drum sound, everthing else sounds the same.

Now, the DTS cd mix is different beast....It has some drums(My Rivial) that are on all of the stereo versions but are missing from the new 5:1 mixes. It sticks out like a sore-thumb to me. But I hardly play the DTS version.

I'm still giving this release a 10...and IMHO there is no major difference between the SACD/DVD-A....except for the cracks ; )
 

kumquad

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
20
I have the SACD version, (I bought the DVD-A, but no play on my 563a) and thought the sonics and mix to very good to excellent. Lower score because this isn't a great Steely Dan LP, much rather have Aja or Katy Lied in surround.

kumquad
 

Frantic

701 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
741
Location
Maryland
Great on DVD-A (y)

The only reason I gave it a 9 rating was because of the lack of extras.
 

Rudy

Active Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
76
Location
Canton MI USA
Not my favorite SD album, but better than the two recent ones. Predictable surround mix, but not bad. It gets an 8 from me.
 

Chris Gerhard

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
2,659
Location
Little Rock, AR
This album is the biggest improvement I have observed from CD to DVD-A. Surround mix is great and music very good, a solid 9 for me. I don't plan on buying many high resolution surround recordings of music I am so familiar with but this is one that was worth it for me.

Chris
 

aquadad

400 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
449
Location
Hillsboro, OR
MIDIQ said:
I have this one on DTS CD, and it is just fantastic. I gave it a 10, great songs and great surround mix, a must have for me. I can't see any reason to upgrade to the DVD-A or SACD, this one sounds superb to me in DTS CD. :)
I second your emotion!(y)
 

buc18

Active Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2005
Messages
71
All of the Steely Dan/Fagen discs get high marks from me and this is no exception. This one has a soft spot in my heart as it was the first DVD-A that I bought and thus my intro into hi rez surround. I wasn't disappointed. A 10!
 

umrk

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Messages
10
Location
grafton
I was a bit disappointed with my SACD version compared to my regular 16 bit copy.

The SACD doesn't sound that much better. Just a little less grainy.

I always thought that the regular 16 bit version was a good example of how good a well made CD could sound.

I qualify this comment by saying that I use a good quality CD player but only a modest priced SACD player.
 

timbre4

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Moderator
QQ Supporter
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
8,380
Location
College Grove, TN
The DVD-A is very smooth; not the best I've ever heard but no regrets. The old DTS CD was pretty good for what it was in it's day but this is the rest of the sound we always knew was there.
 

hafquark

400 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Messages
424
Location
Norman, OK
I'd say about 8 to 9 for the music, and a 10 for the audio and surround mix. It's pretty much a reference quality DVD-A to show off your 5.1 setup.
 

bmoura

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2003
Messages
9,518
Location
Redwood City, CA
I was a bit disappointed with my SACD version compared to my regular 16 bit copy.

The SACD doesn't sound that much better. Just a little less grainy.

I always thought that the regular 16 bit version was a good example of how good a well made CD could sound.

I qualify this comment by saying that I use a good quality CD player but only a modest priced SACD player.

Hmm, must be the SACD player. Listening to Gaucho here in Super Audio CD surround, it's excellent!
 

fzappa

Active Member
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
64
Location
Montana
One of those discs I reserve a 10 for. I have the DVDa. Definitely one to be used for demo'ing your system.
 

leevitalone1

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
3,989
Location
The navel of NY state
a keeper. I have yet to hear the sacd or dts but this was very well thought out. I have all the dvd-audio stuff that the dan put out and all of fagens solo stuff on HR. I'm extremly pleased with this stuff. from a tape master to almost perfection, with no audible noise that was always there in older formats. I remember my 1st cd player , I had "Abbey Road" you could hear the tape start ( hiss). but now all this stuff from the 70's sounds sooo nice!
 
Top