TIDAL unveils Sony 360 Reality Audio

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

humprof

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Jun 10, 2016
Messages
3,274
Location
NoCal
MPEG-H shouldn't require expensive hardware/chips, but it would require a fair amount of processing to implement if its full video & '3D audio' as specified, hence more expensive than the 'normal' devices, but I wonder if there is a royalty payment to use it akin to HDMI.
Shouldn't be any royalties; my understanding is that MPEG-H is an open standard. Perhaps Sony's particular implementation of it involves money, though...
 

winopener

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
4,039
Since there is the Fraunhofer Inst. behind MPEG-H, the very likely route for this should be the same as old MP3 +- 25 years ago (napster time): open standard and source code available but you can't distribuite compiled code specific for a platform unless you pay $$$.
The inclusion of 360ra into ffmpeg and android code are promising, it should be seen how it will be implemented.
 

alek2702

New member
Joined
Aug 15, 2021
Messages
4
Location
PL
Since there is the Fraunhofer Inst. behind MPEG-H, the very likely route for this should be the same as old MP3 +- 25 years ago (napster time): open standard and source code available but you can't distribuite compiled code specific for a platform unless you pay $$$.
The inclusion of 360ra into ffmpeg and android code are promising, it should be seen how it will be implemented.
So with ffmpeg implementation, would one be able to extract the 7.1 stems out of the Tidal stuff for example? Is there any more news on this?
 

MagnumX

400 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
458
Location
Ohio
I love he wants you subscribe and "like" without watching the dang video first. That's like those web sites that throw a friggin' popup to subscribe before you've even seen one iota of their site. I dump'em and say F'em. Too many damn bad web sites and Internet behavior anymore. They should not be rewarded for being greedy bastids.

OMG...I couldn't resist. This guy has his lips PLASTERED on Sony's virtual BUTT. I never heard such a sheer level of brown nosing in my entire life. Garbage speakers that magically sound better than EVERY FLIPPING SPEAKER ON EARTH. It was AWESOME!!!!! :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

No center speaker. His response? "It's BETTER than having one! Why bother! It's SO AWESOME!!!! Wow. How much does Sony pay this guy to sing the Sony's praises. I couldn't help but leave the guy a response saying just that too. My god....
 
Last edited:

HomerJAU

Moderator: MCH Media Players
Staff member
Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jun 13, 2013
Messages
4,281
Location
Melbourne, Australia
It did mention the 2nd HDMI was eArc and mentioned it could pass surround so I guess the A9 can send surround to an AVR. I’d imagine that would feed from its surround streaming apps.

If that assumption is correct, Sony should consider selling the box only. No speakers.
 

winopener

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
4,039
It did mention the 2nd HDMI was eArc and mentioned it could pass surround so I guess the A9 can send surround to an AVR. I’d imagine that would feed from its surround streaming apps.

If that assumption is correct, Sony should consider selling the box only. No speakers.
The fun thing (or we may say, very ironic) is that, after 5.1, 6.1, 7.1 12.1.2, 24.348.8192 and so on :) we're back to classic quadraphonic setup, with a "theorical" reinforcement which to me it seems just a way to reinforce bass response than developing height (sony speakers are defined as 4.0.4).

Have a look at these old Philips speakers....


 

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
24,942
Location
London, England
It did mention the 2nd HDMI was eArc and mentioned it could pass surround so I guess the A9 can send surround to an AVR. I’d imagine that would feed from its surround streaming apps.

If that assumption is correct, Sony should consider selling the box only. No speakers.
if that little control box can properly decode 360 Reality Audio and route it to any old HDMI receiver discrete (5.1, 5.1+?) that would make it a great piece of kit, so much so i'd get the set and ditch the speakers to enjoy all the 360 stuff properly played back (until Sony pull the 360RA streaming from Tidal as they're bound to do and then it'd all just sit in a cupboard! 😂 )
 

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
24,942
Location
London, England
The fun thing (or we may say, very ironic) is that, after 5.1, 6.1, 7.1 12.1.2, 24.348.8192 and so on :) we're back to classic quadraphonic setup, with a "theorical" reinforcement which to me it seems just a way to reinforce bass response than developing height (sony speakers are defined as 4.0.4).

Have a look at these old Philips speakers....


wow those are goofy speakers! what sounds did those Philips speakers route out of the unit on the top of the speaker cabinet? looks like low end from just looking at the driver itself?

wouldn't "4.0.4" be 4 main channels, no LFE and 4 height channels?

its amazing Sony's "gone back to Quad", souped it up to 'Quad+' and called it 360 Reality Audio!!! 🤯😂
 

winopener

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
4,039
wow those are goofy speakers! what sounds did those Philips speakers route out of the unit on the top of the speaker cabinet? looks like low end from just looking at the driver itself?

wouldn't "4.0.4" be 4 main channels, no LFE and 4 height channels?

its amazing Sony's "gone back to Quad", souped it up to 'Quad+' and called it 360 Reality Audio!!! 🤯😂
I suspect the upper is a passive woofer, have a pair of them but never opened to see what's going inside. Decent sound if you place on a bookshelf. These were not a low-end but a bottom-end product, elegant version of boomboxes.
But they do provide height channel :) and with 4 of them you have a system that looks like 4.0.4 ;)
 
Top