sspsandy
600 Club - QQ All-Star
Don't need to click on them now, they are in the posting. Cool.
Yes I did! And I promise that I will get a webpage up with all of Nick's UD-4 info when I get into some "free time" coming (hopefully) by the end of this month. I have to implement the newest vB Homepage software, then I can use it to have the UD-4 and more sections done!radioheadrox said:Hey, I noticed that you put the UD-4 logo in the QQ banner image, Jon. Very cool
Also you have a UHJ decoder with UD4 MatrixMalcolm2010 said:Well today I became the proud owner of a Denon UDA-100, cost me £33 ($60).
it is here:-
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5726980683&ssPageName=ADME:B:EOAB:UK:6
It should be with me in the next couple of days and I will post here on its performance. I only have the UD-4 side of Quadrafile to test with, but it was mainly bought for the CD-4 demodulator.I can directly compare QS from my QSD-2, SQ from my S&IC, UD-4 and CD-4 through the Denon.
I now have to look for a suitable UD-4/CD-4 cartridge, my Audio Technica AT-120 will not be good enough, and the AT-331 has been discontinued. Has anyone tried the AT-440?, on paper at least, it looks better than the AT-331 (It was the next model up in the range)
I don't hold out much hope of finding any UD-4 lp's that I can afford, but at least it gives me CD-4, something I have been wanting for a while. Turntable is fine, a Technics SL1200 MK 1 with low capacity leads.
Jon, add me to the small list of UD-4 owners please !!
Ralph (Quadfather) your fault !! you sold me on CD-4 after all the praise :sun
Cheers
Malcolm
rustyandi said:Also you have a UHJ decoder with UD4 Matrix
I have tested it with my IMF UHJ decoder and it is
close enough
It is not as good as QSD 2 Or TATE but is does a good job
on stereo with QS switch
Ron
bayards said:To all and Malcolm,
Well the UDA-100 is on the desk at work - big bugger!
For those looking for new Shibata like cartridges you may like to investigate ebay's Ed Saunders:
He says
Frequently I manufacture things that are no longer available and this is one: I have been working with Audio Technica and formerly with Pfanstiehl for some time now to develop a new discrete quad CD-4 compatible turntable cartridge. Well, today it is here. What we have done is outfit a contemporary cartridge with a bielliptical (Shibata) stylus to deliver the reverse carrier frequency that contains the channel 3 and 4 audio. That is all a quad cartridge really was to start with. The MAIN ingredient in quad is the stylus tip shape. This cartridge doesn't come with a spec sheet, it's a home brew. Let the customer comments below be your guide. Available in half-inch mount or P mount just specify which you want after the auction.
I bought one (but have yet to mount it) but lots of customer praise on his ebay shop:
Ed saunders
I thought I still had my Quadrafile LP - but can't find it. Hopefully the unit will respond to my CD-4 records if it has been set-up. I don't have any UD-4 discs.
Interesting to see the UHJ capability - I have some cassettes taken directly off air of BBC trials in the 70's (including a Genesis concert) and a Radio 4 play. Will give them a whirl and see what happens!
Malcolm - noticed your ad on the retro hifi site - if you do get a UD-4 demo record to set up in the future, could I possibly borrow it (will pay registered postage and such) - and if my searches turn anything up I'll reciprocate of course. And anyone else out there that would be willing to loan (I'm in London).
Can't wait to try my Cd-4 copy of "The Jackson's Greatest Hits" - ohhhh luvverlyeyyy!
Cheers
Howard
PS - he has another for sale at $49.95 here:
Quad cartridge for sale
The Quadfather said:Ed sent me one of his carts which I agreed to review. Unfortunately it did not perform as well as the AT331LP. Now the 331LP has been discontinued, and is not supported. No doubt Ed regrets sending me that cart, but I will not lie to y'all for a free cart. I reckon I will have to go to an expensive cart when I need to buy one.
The Quadfather
bayards said:I mounted mine in my new Technics turntable - and CD4 is very good. I can't compare (or remember that far back to when I had original equipment) but is does a good job. I don't have any UD4 discs to try out, but at $49 for the odd conversion job it's not a bad buy.
I just wish LP's didn't crackle and plop so much!
H
xpablo said:hello! i'm new to this format and i really like to know all the legendary format,
can anyone tell me where can i get the uda-100 or ud-4 service manual just for personal research, because i need to know what the technology inside that system and how the system operate.
thanks to everyone in this forum.
xpablo said:thanks Quadfather for your reply, now i'm getting more understand about this technology.
but if this system more transparent than other quad unit on that time why the manufacture don't produce any more?
Quad First said:I have all of those AES papers about UD-4, as well as those on CD-4 and the matrix formats. I have already sent Jon much of it, which is what his new page on UD-4 will be based on. I hadn't sent the AES technical information, but will do so now. He (Jon) already has the information booklet that Nippon-Columbia offered to the press when the system was introduced for sale. I will scan and send the AES technical papers shortly. UD-4 was initially sold in the Japanese market, then introduced in England. Plans were for USA introduction when the quad market collapsed. I have supplied Jon with a complete disc release list. There was only one demodulator model sold, the UDA-100, which also demodulates CD-4 and has basic non-logic positions for SQ & QS as well. There were several prototype models made that only demodulate UD-4, having no CD-4 or matrix settings. I have the full schematics and service manual for the UDA-100. I once submitted the schematics to a contact at JVC in Japan who ran the CD-4 department back in the day. The UDA-100 is based on later JVC designs in the demodulation section, having automatic carrier level control. I have all the prototype models, some which play in the matrix only mode, and others that add the carrier directionality, in addition to the commercially sold UDA-100. I find UD-4 to be a fine system. The only albums that I can directly compare musically and separation wise to other formats are Quadraphile, Tubular Bells 4YX-9026, and the Buddy Cole 4RX-9012 which was released by Alshire in the USA on QS and Q8. I have never found the other title that would directly compare, 4RX-9011 The World of Bacharach & Webb / 101 Strings Orchestra. I'm pressed for time now, I'll post or send more information next week.
Enter your email address to join: