Then there are Christmas albums by not-so-great (and worse) artists; or, acts that are so basic and conventional in approach that the simplicity and authenticity is unquestionably appealing even if (otherwise) it's not your kinda stuff. I could list dozens here--some well remembered, some forgotten. I'll contribute some entries later, but just wanted to say that, being born a Catholic (I'm just a universal spiritual now) I have special fondness for holiday albums of all kinds, genres, etc. Some are boring, some truly sincere, some poppy, some rock, some from acts that probably should have known better but did it because it was expected and, of course, year after year (hopefully) regular sales.
Christmas Album Guilty Pleasures # 1 & 2: the Christmas Album (s) of Anita Bryant (CS 9520) and Jim Nabors (CS 9531), both from 1967.
Why? Well, heh...with Anita, the holier-than-thou and fair vocal talent, this was a natural for her, and she sings well behind the generic backing and production. Nabors? He was Gomer Pyle then, and hearing that aww-shucks voice he used for his TV show made any listening to his recordings strange, because he didn't have much vocal range and was pure pop, not the country hick his TV work would have you believe. His Xmas album is warm and kindly, but embalmed, as so much of Columbia's pop albums were for too many years, from Faith, Conniff and Kostelanetz to Goulet, Bryant, Nabors, John Davidson).
But because they're Christmas, it's Ok, but their more obvious pop output I find appalling.
Discuss...
ED