Sinatra at the Sands article

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I'm not a Sinatra fan but I have to say that I am excited about this one. I think it's just to see what can be done with multichannel mixing at this point. And sitting at a ringside table sounds like the right thing to try to acheive.
 
Bob Romano said:
I'm not a Sinatra fan but I have to say that I am excited about this one. I think it's just to see what can be done with multichannel mixing at this point. And sitting at a ringside table sounds like the right thing to try to acheive.

I'm a bit worried because i was not a fan of the "you're sitting where Neil was sitting" way of mixing Harvest. But, let's see what happens.
 
I'm really looking forward to this re-release of this fantastic album! Even though my friends and I were into hard rock in our youth this was one album that we loved to listen to. The big-band arrangements are killer and the up-tempo songs swing in a very cool way.
 
Had to choose between picking this up or the new/old Deep Purple decided on this and am glad I did. This is a nice disc. There are a couple of things to keep in mind about this disc:
First, it is a live recording from 1966, and second, it is a live recording from 1966. With that in mind I have to say "Wow". This is a great set and it sounds very very good considering the source. Very little tape hiss and not much to complain about the sonics. Not a ton of discrete use of the rears but enough. I found myself having to turn down the rears a bit as the vocals are mixed for the middle of the room rather than from the front. Turning down the rears a bit helped a lot in putting Frank more forward in the room. This is the best I have heard Sinatra sound in my house in any format and better than any studio recording I have of him. Highly recommended.
 
GaryW said:
Had to choose between picking this up or the new/old Deep Purple decided on this and am glad I did. This is a nice disc. There are a couple of things to keep in mind about this disc:
First, it is a live recording from 1966, and second, it is a live recording from 1966. With that in mind I have to say "Wow". This is a great set and it sounds very very good considering the source. Very little tape hiss and not much to complain about the sonics. Not a ton of discrete use of the rears but enough. I found myself having to turn down the rears a bit as the vocals are mixed for the middle of the room rather than from the front. Turning down the rears a bit helped a lot in putting Frank more forward in the room. This is the best I have heard Sinatra sound in my house in any format and better than any studio recording I have of him. Highly recommended.

Well I went to the local (Toronto, Canada) BestBuy to pick this up and it wasn't there! Neither was Chicago V. They said maybe Friday. Instead the guy said the Tuesday truck was restocking for DVD-A after the big 20% off sale just passed. They weren't kidding. Hundreds of discs of things I already had! :mad:@:
 
GaryW said:
Had to choose between picking this up or the new/old Deep Purple decided on this and am glad I did. This is a nice disc. There are a couple of things to keep in mind about this disc:
First, it is a live recording from 1966, and second, it is a live recording from 1966. With that in mind I have to say "Wow". This is a great set and it sounds very very good considering the source. Very little tape hiss and not much to complain about the sonics. Not a ton of discrete use of the rears but enough. I found myself having to turn down the rears a bit as the vocals are mixed for the middle of the room rather than from the front. Turning down the rears a bit helped a lot in putting Frank more forward in the room. This is the best I have heard Sinatra sound in my house in any format and better than any studio recording I have of him. Highly recommended.

Hmmm....you have me worried...since I didn't like Harvest, and the same guy, Elliot Mazer, I think, did this one too. Don't care for the "floating head in the middle of the room" routine.
 
I got this DVD-A today (along with Chicago V and Deep Purple at the BB in Manchester) and was pretty pleased. Got the wife to sit down and listen, and after I figured out this was the "Frank in the middle of the room" effect, I liked it a lot. The band is really clear, and while not a real "surround" effect with the instruments, it works well on this live effort. I would rate this one high, considering its age and that it is a live recording. An absolute must if you like Sinatra.

:-jon
 
JonUrban said:
I got this DVD-A today (along with Chicago V and Deep Purple at the BB in Manchester) and was pretty pleased. Got the wife to sit down and listen, and after I figured out this was the "Frank in the middle of the room" effect, I liked it a lot. The band is really clear, and while not a real "surround" effect with the instruments, it works well on this live effort. I would rate this one high, considering its age and that it is a live recording. An absolute must if you like Sinatra.

:-jon

I am one of those guys who liked the mix on "Harvest" so I think this will be awesome. I have had a few FS discs over the years but have been looking for the ultimate one. Of course a perfect disc would not be whole without "New York, New York." But this one looks close.
 
I think this one may cause the same kind of flap that "Pet Sounds" has. Glorious sound - Sinatra's albums were always impeccably recorded, and this one is no exception. The Basie Orchestra in hi-rez is especially sweet.

The mix, however, may bum out vocals-in-the-center partisans. The orchestra is spread across the front soundstage and into the surrounds, with the drums in the center and Basie's piano on the left. Sinatra's vocals are on both the right and left sides, with some bleed to the surrounds. The liner notes indicated the remix was done directly from the original four-track recording. I suspect Mazer was trying to replicate the sound you would hear in a large club, with the orchestra coming at you essentially live and unamplified from all sides, and the vocalist coming through PAs on either side of the stage. As some (including myself) have noted with "Pet Sounds," the mix seems to work better if you turn down the rear speakers.

I like it. I can't wait to hear what they do with "September of My Years."


peace,
yrd
 
radiodaddy said:
I think this one may cause the same kind of flap that "Pet Sounds" has. Glorious sound - Sinatra's albums were always impeccably recorded, and this one is no exception. The Basie Orchestra in hi-rez is especially sweet.

The mix, however, may bum out vocals-in-the-center partisans. The orchestra is spread across the front soundstage and into the surrounds, with the drums in the center and Basie's piano on the left. Sinatra's vocals are on both the right and left sides, with some bleed to the surrounds. The liner notes indicated the remix was done directly from the original four-track recording. I suspect Mazer was trying to replicate the sound you would hear in a large club, with the orchestra coming at you essentially live and unamplified from all sides, and the vocalist coming through PAs on either side of the stage. As some (including myself) have noted with "Pet Sounds," the mix seems to work better if you turn down the rear speakers.

I like it. I can't wait to hear what they do with "September of My Years."




peace,
yrd
I just saw the songlist for this, and it looks pretty tasty. I might have to get it and tweak the rears.....sounds like a good one.
 
I finally picked this disc up. Unfortunately I made the mistake of playing it right after the SACD of "Bucky Pizzarelli - Swing Live". What a huge difference!! Once I got used to the difference in the lower clarity and realism the Sinatra disc started to sound better. Sinatra's voice is impecably produced and the mix is very similar to "Harvest". Frank a lot of the time is sitting in your lap and is very realistic just like the Neil Young effect in "Harvest". The orchestra is less so. I was hoping on more impact to the orchestra but I guess it was recorded in 1966 so we can't expect that kind of punchy brass sound. A bit thin but some surprises in others. Overall for a recording of this age it is very good if not incredible. Just don't play Bucky before it. In fact, don't play Bucky before anything else. It is my new demo disc.
 
Hi,

Well, I picked it up last nite and it's most pleasant suprise to me was what they've been able todo with a live recording.

I wasn't overly impressed with the sacds Concert for New York City and Roger Waters in Berlin, which has made me a little apprehensive of a slew of "Front Row Live" efforts about to be released.

Guy, I liked Harvest also but I'll have to listen to it again because the similarities in mix don't come readily to mind.

Gary, I didn't do any speaker adjustments and don't feel (on my setup) that the rears were too emphasized. The surrounds did in my opinion put us alternately in the audience and in the center of the band and at times put the audience in the center of the band, of course the stereo mix which is supposed tobe 192/24 and is superb (BTW can anyone confirm the rez on 2ch) would take care of the surrounds issue.

This work was recorded in 66 and I did a quick comparison of the 61 sacd recording of The First Time the Duke Ellington and Count Basie which was a studio recording done in 61.

Even though the emphasis is on Frank Sinatra, The Count Basie orchestra was by no means in the background to the discs credit.

I think if I read the liner notes correctly Frank brought out his personal accompanyist/piano player Bill Miller for "One More for the Road".

I've made some mistakes in my choice of HIREZ purchases, this is deffinitely not one of them. "Sinatra at The Sands" will get lots of air time at my place.

Peter m.
PS: also Picked up Shania's "UP!", haven't listened to it yet
 
petermwilson said:
the stereo mix which is supposed tobe 192/24 and is superb (BTW can anyone confirm the rez on 2ch)

The stereo hi-rez mix is 192/24.
 
Anyone had any difficulties playing this disc.Just got it today and it won't play in either a Meridian 598 or Pioneer 717.It won't load at all !Probably just a bad copy !

Manus
 
Hi Manus,
I've loaded it into my dvd-a and my sacd which will play the dd5.1 and my Panny rp82 without the analog cables connected and it plays in Dolby prologic II which I don't understand but anyway it plays.
The fact that neither player will allow it to load means that it's still in the jewel case or its defective.

Peter m.
 
petermwilson said:
Hi Manus,
I've loaded it into my dvd-a and my sacd which will play the dd5.1 and my Panny rp82 without the analog cables connected and it plays in Dolby prologic II which I don't understand but anyway it plays.
The fact that neither player will allow it to load means that it's still in the jewel case or its defective.

Peter m.

Thanks for that ,Peter.I've mailed it back to Canada.I just hope it doesn't take the 3 months it took em to change the last defective disc I had. Looking forward to hearing this too.

Regards,
Manus
 
I have never had a defective disc. Either I have been extremely lucky or my player cares less about flaws.


Manmc said:
Thanks for that ,Peter.I've mailed it back to Canada.I just hope it doesn't take the 3 months it took em to change the last defective disc I had. Looking forward to hearing this too.

Regards,
Manus
 
Hi,
My original Chicago II disc was deffective, which was repaced by BestBuy. It had dropouts on several songs. the repacement was fine.

Thats the only one. I thought Miles Davis "kind of Blue" was a defective sacd based on the first 2 tracs, but was told it was a mic placement issue that was also evident on the LP.

Peter m.
 
Back
Top