See the press release!
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/s...03/0002004116&EDATE=WED+Aug+20+2003,+01:55+PM
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/s...03/0002004116&EDATE=WED+Aug+20+2003,+01:55+PM
bnyhof said:
Guy Robinson said:Let's hope that they put some time into each title and just don't take a DSP approach.
bizmopeen said:(Hey, I just think I made “Silverline” a verb.)
ct said:I find the comments interesting. In my experience both outfits have never issued a "hi rez" release, even the DVD's were 20/44 resolution, and the EMI classical releases apparently didn't use multi=track masters, another system was used "in house" and frankly I found them the least enjoyable of any classical releases, except for Hodie's slow conductor, M. Cobra, which I wrote off after buying three Mozart releases on which he was still practicing his doctoral thesis.
FenderP said:Same has been argued for Universal's DVD-As not all being hi-rez. I mean, I think discs like Fagen's "Nightfly" which is 48 sounds great. If DTS can help EMI improve the quality of their hi-rez releases, DVD-A or SACD, I'm all for it.
FenderP said:Same has been argued for Universal's DVD-As not all being hi-rez. I mean, I think discs like Fagen's "Nightfly" which is 48 sounds great. If DTS can help EMI improve the quality of their hi-rez releases, DVD-A or SACD, I'm all for it.
I know that; DTS is DVD-A only. EMI is not. Again, this isn't a DVD-A vs. SACD thread. Both are good, viable formats.Jesper said:DTS will not release anything in SACD and if you read carfully in the press release, they are talking about DVD Audio - ONLY! :sun
Enter your email address to join: