Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:


2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Apr 9, 2012
The actual answer is probably that it doesn't much matter. All the equipment you mentioned is late model and good quality so however you hook it up it's gonna sound great. The surround master has a DSP unit in it that is very good (Analog Devices Sharc I think , ) and the Exasound is about as good as it gets. Your pdf is of a McIntosh and I don't think there would be any complaints about the sound of that either.

You are running up against one of the big problems with multichannelism. The lack of versatile preamp/processors with flexible and sufficient input switching quantity. The MX122 at least has one single RCA mch input.

What you could do is get two of these:,electronics,136&sr=1-20&th=1

and put them between the Exa and the SM on the inputs and the MX 122 on the output. You will have to push two buttons to switch between them.
I have one of these and there is no difference at all between the audio and video channels except the color of the RCA receptacles. This is not elegant but will allow you to have the best of both worlds without having to rassle with cables. There are also some solutions from folks like Zektor and others that will work maybe even better but this would cost $40 to try out.

Actually 2 Texas TAS3204's


ar surround

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Apr 3, 2010
New Joisey
Yep, I liked the review but I dunno where the "mid fi" comment came from as by any tests it really is tip top fi. I suppose if the price tag is around 1 k it is deemed to be mid fi.
Up the price to US$ 8000, then it will be deemed to be "hi fi." LOL The Surround Master is most definitely is a high fidelity component. Some purists only consider as hi-fi those components which do nothing to the signal path and are all analog in the entire signal chain. Like one of these, for example: