My turntable finally gave up the ghost.
I need a new turntable that can play CD-4..
Any help appreciated
Thanks
My turntable finally gave up the ghost.
I need a new turntable that can play CD-4..
Any help appreciated
Thanks
I realize that I am risking a barrage of hate mail, but straight tonearms are better-suited to clean CD-4 performance than S-shaped arms. This isn't just my opinion. Search for Cai Campbell's opinions on CD-4 playback. My main CD-4 turntable is a Rega P3 with an Audio Technica AT-15Sa CD-4 cartridge, and I have a Dual 704 in my home office with an Audio Technica AT14S. Both are moving magnet cartridges with Shibata styli. Some guys will tell you that they use cartridges without the correct styli, but the Shibata was designed for CD-4 playback. Be prepared for a lot of "I am using such-and-such, and it works fine" replies, but it isn't that simple.
Low-capacitance tonearm cables are just as important as the cartridge and stylus. The requirement is for less than 200 pF from the cartridge pins to the demodulator, but less than 100 pF is much better. I rewired my Rega with a low-capacitance Incognito wiring kit, and I replaced the Dual tonearm cables with Belden wiring. Both were great improvements in CD-4 playback, and both are now less than 100 pF of capacitance. Also, even if a cartridge has a frequency response that 'seems' like it will handle the CD-4 subcarrier, the separation spec at those ultrasonic frequencies will determine its CD-4 performance. Just 'getting to' 30 or 40 kHz is no guarantee.
Don't forget the importance of proper tonearm/stylus geometry to CD-4 playback. Until I bought a Geo-Disc alignment protractor, I always thought that my turntables were set up properly using my ancient ADC alignment protractor. Yes, there are free downloadable ones, but most simple devices don't do a complete job because they fail to align to the tonearm pivot point. It was well-worth the price. Let the hate mail begin.
View attachment 40905
[
I'm not at all sure why straight would be different than S, but the rest of the post seems very sound.I realize that I am risking a barrage of hate mail, but straight tonearms are better-suited to clean CD-4 performance than S-shaped arms. This isn't just my opinion. Search for Cai Campbell's opinions on CD-4 playback. My main CD-4 turntable is a Rega P3 with an Audio Technica AT-15Sa CD-4 cartridge, and I have a Dual 704 in my home office with an Audio Technica AT14S. Both are moving magnet cartridges with Shibata styli. Some guys will tell you that they use cartridges without the correct styli, but the Shibata was designed for CD-4 playback. Be prepared for a lot of "I am using such-and-such, and it works fine" replies, but it isn't that simple.
Low-capacitance tonearm cables are just as important as the cartridge and stylus. The requirement is for less than 200 pF from the cartridge pins to the demodulator, but less than 100 pF is much better. I rewired my Rega with a low-capacitance Incognito wiring kit, and I replaced the Dual tonearm cables with Belden wiring. Both were great improvements in CD-4 playback, and both are now less than 100 pF of capacitance. Also, even if a cartridge has a frequency response that 'seems' like it will handle the CD-4 subcarrier, the separation spec at those ultrasonic frequencies will determine its CD-4 performance. Just 'getting to' 30 or 40 kHz is no guarantee.
Don't forget the importance of proper tonearm/stylus geometry to CD-4 playback. Until I bought a Geo-Disc alignment protractor, I always thought that my turntables were set up properly using my ancient ADC alignment protractor. Yes, there are free downloadable ones, but most simple devices don't do a complete job because they fail to align to the tonearm pivot point. It was well-worth the price. Let the hate mail begin.
View attachment 40905
Enter your email address to join: