Here's the deal: No, I am not going to tell you what the titles were, or if I thought they were great or sucked. I am assuming that Marshall is asking me in confidence, and I do not want to betray that confidence.
What I will say to you is that if it's a title that I think will not be a great quad release, or a title that might not fit what we're all looking for, I will tell him. It doesn't have to be a title that I particularly do not like to get a down vote from me. I think I can say without too much bull that I have a good feeling what the quad community will think is great and what they will think is crap.
For example, if Marshall asked me if I thought a title that I really liked and wanted in quad would be good, and I knew I would love it but most others would not, I would tell him that. I would also say that something I did not like but had a great quad mix and would be highly sought after by most of the QQ members, I would say that as well.
I want them to do well. I want them to release great quad releases. I don't want them to fail. The worst thing that could happen at this point is that they release a quad SACD of a so-so title that you all think is a bad choice, you don't buy, and the title itself does not sell stereo or otherwise. The first thing that would be said was "It didn't sell because we put the quad tracks on there".
I do not want that to happen.
I cannot control a thing but I can give an opinion. Brian does the same, and you, as their customers, can email them and suggest stuff and see what happens.
It is very important that the next few AF SACDs with surround tracks are "good" releases that we all get fired up about. Something that makes you all go 'eh', is not what I want to see.
That's my story and I'm sticking to it. You know what I mean, right? (Even though I probably explained it like crap!)