HiRez Poll Alice in Chains - GREATEST HITS [SACD]

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

Rate the SACD of Alice in Chains - GREATEST HITS


  • Total voters
    24

JonUrban

Forum Curmudgeon
Staff member
Admin
Moderator
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
16,879
Location
Connecticut
Please post your comments, thoughts and observations.......(y) (n)
 

Cai Campbell

In Remembrance
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
2,970
Location
Seattle, WA
The music is 10 all the way, but the surround mix is sorely lacking. Another title that should have been great but ends up limp. A terrible missed opportunity here. I gave it a 6.
 

Kazaam

701 Club - QQ All-Star
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
777
Location
Midwest, USA
I own both the CD and SACD versions. One evening I compared the multi-channel SACD with the stereo CD version (running through a DPL2 processor with panorama turned on). I was a little bit surprised at the differences I could hear between the two mixes. I say surprised because I've never been overly impressed with the Alice In Chains SACD; I figured it would sound pretty close to a CD running through DPL2. That's definitely not the case. I'd say the SACD sounds fuller---and better overall. Still... the SACD isn't exactly reference material. I gave it a 5.
 

Bob Romano

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
Moderator
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Apr 26, 2002
Messages
5,324
Location
Viva Las Vegas
Music wise=8...

Sound wise it's a nice souding disc but the mix could use a little more oomph in the surround department. =6

Over all = 7
 

ar surround

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Messages
2,627
Location
New Joisey
I own both the CD and SACD versions. One evening I compared the multi-channel SACD with the stereo CD version (running through a DPL2 processor with panorama turned on). I was a little bit surprised at the differences I could hear between the two mixes. I say surprised because I've never been overly impressed with the Alice In Chains SACD; I figured it would sound pretty close to a CD running through DPL2. That's definitely not the case. I'd say the SACD sounds fuller---and better overall. Still... the SACD isn't exactly reference material. I gave it a 5.
Not my kind of music, but this disc was as must-have because of two tracks that I love: Man In The Box and No Excuses. Melodic dissonance hooks at their best. Despite the so-so surround sound mix, I agree that the 5.1 SACD sounds a lot better than the redbook CD played in pseudo surround. I had given it a 7 overall way back when.
 

phrostbyte

Well-known Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2010
Messages
136
The music is 10 all the way, but the surround mix is sorely lacking. Another title that should have been great but ends up limp. A terrible missed opportunity here. I gave it a 6.
Same here. Alice is one of my favorite bands of all time, but the mix itself is pretty disappointing. I agree with your 6/10.

Some of the other grunge mixes are pretty good though. Core is good. The 2 Soundgarden mixes are actually really nice!
 

azazel

New member
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
3
Location
Australia
ok, let's put this on...

Massive guitar riffs! - awesome!!
...
Iiiimmm the man in the box! - wow, this sounds great! Best I've ever heard this album!

Buri-ed in - my PIT!!

WTF??!!
 

edisonbaggins

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
8,406
Location
Wherever I May Roam
Had a good time blasting this with the Mrs. just now. No, not an audiophile experience, but the best we've heard AiC.
A missed opportunity for more discreteness, sure. But this disc has muscle!
Plenty of surround moments, to my taste.
Backing and even lead vocals, guitar overdubs and sometimes solos.
Drum accents.
 

4-earredwonder

QQ Lifetime Supporter
QQ Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
16,772
Had a good time blasting this with the Mrs. just now. No, not an audiophile experience, but the best we've heard AiC.
A missed opportunity for more discreteness, sure. But this disc has muscle!
Plenty of surround moments, to my taste.
Backing and even lead vocals, guitar overdubs and sometimes solos.
Drum accents.
I remember this mch SACD getting trashed over at the old SA~CD.net and I treated mine, dampered it, put it into my OPPO and it sounded GREAT. Mike, maybe you could do one of your video 'chats' on SACDs that did get trashed but sound reasonably great through a decent sound system. I know, I raised some eyebrows recently when I admitted to LOVING the Bruce Springsteen Live in NYC mch SACD. To be sure, there was applause and ambience in the rear channels, but cranked up, it really sounds quite good...at times even GREAT. Of course there are a few mch SACDs like Ozzfest and George Harrison's Live in Japan that are real duds but I always felt that most SACDs with a little TLC sounded relatively good [or else they wouldn't be chosen for that format in the first place].
 

edisonbaggins

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
8,406
Location
Wherever I May Roam
I think hard rock tends to get rated less well than other genres, around here and generally with surroundheads. I get it. Denser and less discrete. To me, it's whether it improves the experience over stereo and whether there is enough surround to bother.
Will definitely do a vid on this one, eventually!
 

haikubass

1K Club - QQ Shooting Star
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
1,452
Location
Prague
Hey gang, if you like this release enough, definitely check out the DVD Music Bank with all the videos - same mixes, different mastering (yes, it's only Dolby Digital), but most importantly there are songs that are not included on the SACD (or anywhere else): e.g. Sea Of Sorrow, What The Hell Have I, Down In A Hole or Get Born Again.
 
Last edited:

mrcond

300 Club - QQ All-Star
QQ Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
329
Location
Vernon, CT
Hey gang, if you like this release enough, definitely check out the DVD Music Bank with all the videos - same mixes, different mastering (yes, it's only Dolby Digital), but most importantly there are songs that are not included on the SACD (or anywhere else): e.g. Sea Of Sorrow, What The Hell Have I, Down In A Hole or Get Born Again.
Thanks for the tip! A no-brainer for under 10 bucks. Ordered.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

marpow

QQ Lifetime Supporter
QQ Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
4,774
Location
San Mateo CA
I voted 5. This is a fantastic music album, truly greatest hits, but when I am scrolling through my music thinking of what I might want to listen to in 5.1 I cringe when I come across this release. the surround sound is one of the poorest that I know of. My 5 is probably a zero for some because I tend to vote on the high side so a 5 from me is pretty bad.
 

skherbeck

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
3,260
Location
SoCal, USA
I voted 5. This is a fantastic music album, truly greatest hits, but when I am scrolling through my music thinking of what I might want to listen to in 5.1 I cringe when I come across this release. the surround sound is one of the poorest that I know of. My 5 is probably a zero for some because I tend to vote on the high side so a 5 from me is pretty bad.
Yeah, it surprises me that the mixer says he listened to 200 DVDs before mixing this... interesting that this was his first surround mix... another "first surround mix" that kind of sucked would be Oasis "What's The Story Morning Glory" ... thankfully Eddie Kramer's first surround mix turned out really good ("Electric Ladyland")... someone should start a thread of "first surround mixes" (sjcorne?)
 
Top