Listening to Now (In Surround) - Volume 2

QuadraphonicQuad

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I only wish NAXOS had put more effort in selecting and mastering their BD~As, Mike. The rear channels were almost inaudible and frankly sounded better in STEREO and their choice of repertoire was disappointing, as well.

Glad you're getting some breaks in the weather.

Poured here yesterday. Monsoon Rains. A snow flurry a few minutes ago. CRAZY.

And stay SAFE. Who knows when life will return to normal. How's Boris Johnson doing?
That is crazy weather …..looks like another thing that's cock-eyed at the moment.

Boris is slowly on the mend and out of intensive care but still in hospital.
Thanks to our wonderful NHS staff, of which, we have already lost too many, thanks to this virus.

But then It's the same all around the world Ralphie, each country has fantastic people trying their hardest to care for those in need.
I read world and our news on a very regular basis.
You sure have it bad in the States.

You and everyone, please stay safe.
 
1586546104405.png
. . .
1586546006276.png

7F6DA984-35BB-4586-8D3B-3756C6BDF3CC.jpeg

https://www.discogs.com/sell/release/8003954?ev=rb
 
I enjoy my multichannel mixes in paper bags
View attachment 49092 Slim Cessna's Auto Club ‎The Commandments According To SCAC Expanded Audio Edition
only five votes on the
POLL

The same way you had your Porno magazines discretely delivered back in the day......you rascal!

Great album as I likewise have the signed, sealed and delivered 'Paper Bag' version.
 
Last edited:
I have noticed that ALL those replacement SACD and DVD~Audio cases, lately, are composed of thinner materials but if you treat them with 'respect' they should last a long time.

Will be most interested in your report, Eric.

ALL RIGHT here we go, finally got around to ordering these, we will see what shows up...
SJB-ebay.jpg
 

I always thought this one sounded like the front channels are duplicated in the rear with a bit of extra echo or EQ to make them sound slightly different - what's your take? A&M's quads range from being super-discrete (Quincy Jones, Billy Preston, Joan Baez) to faked/upmixed from stereo (Herb Alpert, Carole King).
 
Last edited:
Ah! Warm weather? Freaking cold here today...in fact, we're set up to have another week of below normal temps. I hate it. We actually have a freeze warning 2 nights next week.
Same here, Gene. Did my daily walk this morning in cloudy 36 deg F weather - with a stiff bitchin’ wind that made it feel like 25! Grrr!
 
I always thought this one sounded like the front channels are duplicated in the rear with a bit of extra echo or EQ to make them sound slightly different - what's your take? A&M's quads range from being super-discrete (Quincy Jones, Billy Preston) to faked/upmixed from stereo (Herb Alpert).
Vocals are prominently in front and I don't notice a strong double stereo effect.
I see what you're saying though. Not real discrete.
I think the fidelity is good and I like the way it fills the room
 
I always thought this one sounded like the front channels are duplicated in the rear with a bit of extra echo or EQ to make them sound slightly different - what's your take? A&M's quads range from being super-discrete (Quincy Jones, Billy Preston, Joan Baez) to faked/upmixed from stereo (Herb Alpert, Carole King).

I dunno which Ozark Mountain Daredevils you have, but my copy is definitely a real (discrete) quad mix with the vocals in the front and the drums in the rear. There's a touch of reverb of front instruments in the rear and vice versa, but there's no way you're faking separation like that, espeically with 1974 technology.

I also wouldn't categorise the 60s stuff they put out in quad like Herb Alpert and Burt Bacharach as fake or upmixes either - there's definitely a bit of front/rear separation on these too, though not to the same degree as anything done in the 70s - most likely they were sourced from 3-track (like Miles Davis Kind of Blue) or 4-track multitracks.

The only A&M stuff that strikes me as outright fakery (aside from Tapestry) are the albums recorded in the UK like pre-Foreigner Cat Stevens, Humble Pie Smokin', and the two Joe Cocker albums. I think the unspectacular results with the 3 and 4 track remixes of 60s stuff illustrate why the other major labels mostly or exclusively remixed contemporary 70s material rather than going back into their vaults for older material.
 
Back
Top