HiRez Poll Dylan, Bob - SLOW TRAIN COMING [SACD]

Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:

Rate the SACD of Bob Dylan - SLOW TRAIN COMING

  • 6:

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5:

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4:

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3:

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2: Forget it, Get the CD

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1: Waste of plastic

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    43

JonUrban

Forum Curmudgeon
Staff member
Admin
Moderator
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
16,853
Location
Connecticut
Please post your comments, thoughts and observations.......(y) (n)


 
Last edited by a moderator:

winopener

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
3,969
Excellent surround mix, and a good performance (Mark Knopfler giutar is always amazing). Not a must-have but definitively a disc worth checking for the casual listener too.
 

daved64

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Joined
Mar 24, 2003
Messages
2,647
Location
Milton, Canada
If it was any warmer sounding, I could turn my furnace off! Lovely sound, and great mix. Preachy at times, but hey, that was what he was into. 9
 

EMB

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
Since 2002/2003
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
4,104
Location
The Top 40 Radio of My Mind
Very warm, pleasing sound for one of Bobby's better '70s albums. Much thought was put into the mix, and it shows throughout! Vivid, immediate, intimate...what more could one ask for? A '9' here....

ED:)
 

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
24,368
Location
London, England
the sound on this is so lovely and smooth and rich and analogue-sounding! just a beautifully produced album for me. the mix is a bit kooky but so is the material and the artist (at around this time in particular!).. with all that said and as the best of the Dylan M/C SACD's in my collection, I'll give it an "8".
 

Quad Linda

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
8,735
Location
DROP YOUR WAD ON QUAD Chicago, Illinois
8. I'm a Dylan completist. I HATED Saved, the album that followed this. I loved Shot of Love, the last of his "Jesus period" albums. Perhaps Shot is his most underrated album. OK, back to this one. The fidelity was very nice on the 2ch LP back in the day. Perhaps it sounded better back then 'cause I got a promo when I worked for CBS. The eye was always watching!! The surround mix is nice, some of the material is a bit thin (hence the 8), but what shines truly does. When You Gonna Wake Up and Gotta Serve Somebody are great tracks. Knopfler is an added bonus. If you like Dylan at all, you NEED the SACD box.

You can call me Linda, or you can call me Lin, you can call me Betty, or you can call me yin...or, Betty when you call me, you can call me Al. (Oh, wait, that's some other guy.)
 

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
24,368
Location
London, England
8. I'm a Dylan completist. I HATED Saved, the album that followed this. I loved Shot of Love, the last of his "Jesus period" albums. Perhaps Shot is his most underrated album. OK, back to this one. The fidelity was very nice on the 2ch LP back in the day. Perhaps it sounded better back then 'cause I got a promo when I worked for CBS. The eye was always watching!! The surround mix is nice, some of the material is a bit thin (hence the 8), but what shines truly does. When You Gonna Wake Up and Gotta Serve Somebody are great tracks. Knopfler is an added bonus. If you like Dylan at all, you NEED the SACD box.

You can call me Linda, or you can call me Lin, you can call me Betty, or you can call me yin...or, Betty when you call me, you can call me Al. (Oh, wait, that's some other guy.)
You can call me Al..! Although my name is Adam.. so you can call me Ad..!

sadly the upcoming 25th Anniversary of Graceland, even the bells and whistles (and everything but scarf, marbles and the kitchen sink!) £100 boxset, which has not one but TWO dvds (!) still doesn't even have an advanced res stereo of the album, let alone a 5.1 remix.

just another "missed opportunity"... :(
 

Quad Linda

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
8,735
Location
DROP YOUR WAD ON QUAD Chicago, Illinois
You ain't wrong!

You can call me Al..! Although my name is Adam.. so you can call me Ad..!

sadly the upcoming 25th Anniversary of Graceland, even the bells and whistles (and everything but scarf, marbles and the kitchen sink!) £100 boxset, which has not one but TWO dvds (!) still doesn't even have an advanced res stereo of the album, let alone a 5.1 remix.

just another "missed opportunity"... :(
 

Quad Linda

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
8,735
Location
DROP YOUR WAD ON QUAD Chicago, Illinois

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
24,368
Location
London, England
Yes, but if a 5.1 mix were included in the box, there would be that many fewer copies that Columbia (or whoever Paul leases his stuff to in the future) will be able to sell later on when they decide to market it in surround. Cha-ching-cha-ching!!! Even digital cash registers are very musical.
very sad but very true.. Universal are probably eyeing up a deal for 5 years time with PS right now, preparing a new 5.1 mix for the Graceland 30th anniversary edition.. and will end up canning it all. :(
 

fredblue

2K Club - QQ Super Nova
QQ Supporter
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
24,368
Location
London, England
Listening to this again, I think I was a bit mean giving this an "8". It deserves a "9" for the sonics and mix.

Gorgeous stuff and easily the best multi-channel SACD of Bob Dylan of those I've heard so far.

Still wish Sony had stuck the quad of Desire on the SACD but I can't dock this disc for that stupid decision! :D
 

keenly

Banned
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
1,780
Location
UK
The clarity on this album is amazing. Fantastic recording.
 

marpow

QQ Lifetime Supporter
QQ Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
4,699
Location
San Mateo CA
I voted 7. This SACD 5.1 music is a ten. I have heard people complain of Dylan and his new Christian beliefs (Born Again) but I find this disc superb in song writing and music. Highly enjoyable.
The 7 vote is more for the weak surround, which is more 4.1 than 5.1, the center channel is barely audible, in fact turning the center off is not a problem.
The rears are weak, not discrete at all, lets call it ambient surround. I don't own a stereo version of this release and would be interested to have one as it may be possible the stereo would be better than the surround?
 
Top