Why? You already have that capability in JRiver!
Converting DSD Files to FLAC
- Thread starter Ninecats
- Start date
Help Support QuadraphonicQuad:
Missed that.
If that's how it works, just make a copy of the DSF and convert that. Ditto if you use Foobar.
NO NEED! Keeping the original file is a simple setting under options (as I showed step by step above)!!
Thank you Ted, what post # are you referring to as step by step above?
#75
OK Ted, I am getting there, seems so simple.
I want to leave original file, that is easy.
If I do "save new file to folder" I think it will populate on my NAS music folder? So I should have two in the NAS , one DSF and one FLAC? Then I could take the converted new FLAC file and MOVE it over to my Samsung SSD to play in the car.
Am I getting it?
Sounds good, or in top section of options you could designate new flac files to go in a new folder.
So if your SSD is portable enough you could temporarily attach it to JRiver machine, browse to it and designate that folder for new converted flac files (in options)
Thank you @ted_b that was way too easy.
I converted DSF to FLAC sent the new conversion to my download folder.
Now I can add my little hard drive, move the new FLAC file to it and listen to in car, awesome.
I noticed that the JRiver is reading for playback both the DSF from the NAS and the FLAC from the Download folder.
When I am done adding FLAC file to external car hard drive, I will just delete from download folder and I am right back where I started, awesome, happy.
I converted DSF to FLAC sent the new conversion to my download folder.
Now I can add my little hard drive, move the new FLAC file to it and listen to in car, awesome.
I noticed that the JRiver is reading for playback both the DSF from the NAS and the FLAC from the Download folder.
When I am done adding FLAC file to external car hard drive, I will just delete from download folder and I am right back where I started, awesome, happy.
*If that's how it works*
Others may find the foobar links useful. They really should be a sticky post at the top of this thread.
One little side note, as it is new to me as I never converted DSF to FLAC before.
Listening on the home rig the DSF file does sound a little better.
Another new to me is the conversion rate for the FLAC is 24 bit/352.8Khz. That is what a lot of MQA files come out as.
The whole point for my situation is I now get to listen to my ripped SACD collection in the car, that is a milestone.
Listening on the home rig the DSF file does sound a little better.
Another new to me is the conversion rate for the FLAC is 24 bit/352.8Khz. That is what a lot of MQA files come out as.
The whole point for my situation is I now get to listen to my ripped SACD collection in the car, that is a milestone.
Yes, DSF to FLAC is a lossy process, although with the right filters and such (doable on players like HQPlayer) one can get a FLAC file to sound pretty good from a DSF conversion.
Also, if the car DAC has issues with 24/352.8k you could further downsample to something like 24/176 or lower. The car environment noise floor is pretty high.
Also, if the car DAC has issues with 24/352.8k you could further downsample to something like 24/176 or lower. The car environment noise floor is pretty high.
If DSF sounds different than FLAC, that's placebo.
That's a choice, not a requirement.
24/88.2 would be more than sufficient for any set of ears.
That's should tell you it's audiophool nonsense right there.
In your car, even 24 bits isn't going to matter.
LOL! DSF to FLAC is lossy; it's science not placebo.
Practically nothing is natively recorded as DSD. It all starts life as PCM. So in the strict definition of the term, the conversion of PCM to DSD is also lossy. It doesn't matter so much if a conversion is lossy. What matters is if its audible. I can hear no difference between DSD and a 24/88.2 conversion of the same file. What is easily audible though is the DSP room correction that can be applied to PCM. And I can most certainly hear that.
Before you go filling that drive quicker than needed with large files, try a 24/88.2 version as well and see if you notice the difference. For all we know, the U connect is down sampling to something even lower. It accepts 24/352.8. That doesn't mean it actually decodes that data stream.
OK, good idea, 1 will give it a try. I am sure 24/88.2 is still better than 16/44.1.
Yes, especially 5 or 6 channel files. Those are huge (our own NativeDSD sells, for extreme example, DSD256 multichannel files and an album is enormous). A 24/88.2 or even 24/96 (a few digital devices throw up on 24/88.2 for some reason; it's not in their 44.1 clock spec?) will be plenty for car audio.
Similar threads
